|
Showing 1 - 4 of
4 matches in All Departments
The emergence of new empirical evidence and ethical debate about
families created by assisted reproduction has called into question
the current regulatory frameworks that govern reproductive donation
in many countries. In this multidisciplinary book, social
scientists, ethicists and lawyers offer fresh perspectives on the
current challenges facing the regulation of reproductive donation
and suggest possible ways forward. They address questions such as:
what might people want to know about the circumstances of their
conception? Should we limit the number of children donors can
produce? Is it wrong to pay donors or to reward them with cut-price
fertility treatments? Is overseas surrogacy exploitative of women
from poor communities? Combining the latest empirical research with
analysis of ethics, policy and legislation, the book focuses on the
regulation of gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy at a time
when more people are considering assisted reproduction and when new
techniques and policies are underway.
To what extent should parents be able to choose the kind of child
they have? The unfortunate phrase 'designer baby' has become
familiar in debates surrounding reproduction. As a reference to
current possibilities the term is misleading, but the phrase may
indicate a societal concern of some kind about control and choice
in the course of reproduction. Typically, people can choose whether
to have a child. They may also have an interest in choosing, to
some extent, the conditions under which they do so, such as whether
they have a child with a serious disability or disease. The purpose
of this book is to explore the difficult and controversial question
of the appropriate ethical and legal extent of reproductive
autonomy in this context. The book examines ethical, legal and
public policy issues in prenatal screening, prenatal diagnosis
(PND), selective abortion and preimplantation genetic diagnosis
(PGD). It explores the ethics of these selection practices and the
ability of current ethical guidelines and legal mechanisms,
including the law on selective abortion and wrongful birth, to deal
with advances in genetic and other knowledge in these areas. Unlike
in the United States, in England the relevant law is not inherently
rights-based, but the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998
inevitably raises questions about the proper scope of reproductive
autonomy in this context. The implications of the analysis are
considered for the development of relevant law, public policy and
ethical guidelines and will be of interest to academics in medical
law and ethics, health professionals, lawyers, those working on
public policy and students with an interest in these issues.
If a pregnant woman refuses medical treatment needed by the fetus -
for instance for religious reasons - or conducts some aspect of her
life in a way which risks fetal harm, there may arise an instance
of "maternal-fetal conflict". This is an unfortunate term, since
pregant women are generally renowned for their self-sacrificing
behaviour, but it may well reflect the reality of certain maternal
choices and actions. Should a pregnant woman have the legal right
to refuse medical treatment needed by the fetus, or should she owe
it a legal duty of care which precludes her acting in ways which
may harm it? Does the debate hinge simply upon the appropriateness,
or otherwise, of legally compelling presumed moral obligations, or
is it more complex than this? Indeed, what are a pregnant woman't
moral obligations towards her fetus? In England and in some US
states, courts have held that a pregnant woman has the right to
refuse medical treatment needed by the fetus. In similar fashion,
the idea of a general maternal legal duty of care toward the fetus
has been rejected, most recently in Canada. The cases, however,
leave the impression of an uncomfortable split between the ethics
and the law, as if the problem were entirely one of not legally
enforcing presumed moral duties. The effect is both puzzling and
polarising: puzzling in that the cases leave unanswered - as
largely they must - the huge question of a pregnant woman's moral
rights and duties; polarising in that the cases leave troubling
tensions about a pregnant woman's rights in the face of fetal harm
or death. The tendency is to deny these by ever more strongly
asserting a woman's rights. In turn this encourages a reaction in
favour of fetal rights, one which is unlikely to attend to a
woman's interests and difficulties in pregnancy. This could have
serious legal repercussions for various instances of maternal-fetal
conflict, including in those US states or other jurisdictions which
have yet to address these issues. It might also increase the
pressures on the issue of abortion. This book, which seeks a way
between these polarised positions, tries to explain and justify a
woman's moral and legal rights in pregnancy and, at the same time,
to explore the extent of her moral duties toward the fetus. The aim
is to resolve, as far as possible, the ethical, legal and social
tensions which undoubtedly surround this area. Innovatively in work
on this issue (and unusually in the field of medical law and
ethics) the author adopts a joint philosophical and legal approach
directed to issues both of principle and policy, revealing strong
conceptual links between the ethics and the law. In addition to an
ethical exploration of the maternal-fetal relationship, the author
explores and analyses the relevant English, American, Canadian (and
sometimes Australian) arguments from the law of treatment refusal,
abortion, tort and rescue, as well as relevant jurisprudence from
the European Court of Human Rights. This important book breaks new
ground and will be of great interest to academics in law and
philosophy, lawyers, health professionals, policy-makers and
students of medical law and ethics. "It is rare to find a book
which so skilfully combines legal and moral analysis of a
controversial medical issue. Rosamund Scott has produced what is
undoubtedly one of the finest pieces of medico-legal writing of
recent years. This is a clever, human and immensely readable work."
Alexander McCall Smith, Professor of Medical Law, University of
Edinburgh "This book concerns one of the most personally agonizing
and morally complex issues in medical ethics. It is a work of great
philosophical sophistication, combining breadth of vision with
acute sensitivity to the nuances of women's experiences. It will
soon become the standard work in philosophical, legal and political
debate on maternal-fetal conflicts." Roger Crisp, Uehiro Fellow and
Tutor in Philosophy, St Anne's College, Oxford
The emergence of new empirical evidence and ethical debate about
families created by assisted reproduction has called into question
the current regulatory frameworks that govern reproductive donation
in many countries. In this multidisciplinary book, social
scientists, ethicists and lawyers offer fresh perspectives on the
current challenges facing the regulation of reproductive donation
and suggest possible ways forward. They address questions such as:
what might people want to know about the circumstances of their
conception? Should we limit the number of children donors can
produce? Is it wrong to pay donors or to reward them with cut-price
fertility treatments? Is overseas surrogacy exploitative of women
from poor communities? Combining the latest empirical research with
analysis of ethics, policy and legislation, the book focuses on the
regulation of gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy at a time
when more people are considering assisted reproduction and when new
techniques and policies are underway.
|
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
Morbius
Jared Leto, Matt Smith, …
DVD
R179
Discovery Miles 1 790
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
|