|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
Midway through 1942, Japanese and Allied forces found themselves
fighting on two fronts-in New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. These
concurrent campaigns, conducted between July 1942 and February
1943, proved a critical turning point in the war being waged in the
Pacific, as the advantage definitively shifted from the Japanese to
the Americans. Key to this shift was the Allies seizing of the
strategic initiative-a concept that Sean Judge examines in this
book, particularly in the context of the Pacific War. The concept
of strategic initiative, in this analysis, helps to explain why and
how contending powers design campaigns and use military forces to
alter the trajectory of war. Judge identifies five factors that
come into play in capturing and maintaining the initiative:
resources, intelligence, strategic acumen, combat effectiveness,
and chance, all of which are affected by political will. His book
uses the dual campaigns in New Guinea and the Solomon Islands as a
case study in strategic initiative by reconstructing the
organizations, decisions, and events that influenced the shift of
initiative from one adversary to the other. Perhaps the most
critical factor in this case is strategic acumen, without which the
other advantages are easily squandered. Specifically, Judge details
how General Douglas MacArthur and Admiral Chester Nimitz, in
designing and executing these campaigns, provided the strategic
leadership essential to reversing the tide of war-whose outcome,
Judge contends, was not as inevitable as conventional wisdom tells
us. The strategic initiative, once passed to American and Allied
forces in the Pacific, would never be relinquished. In its
explanation of how and why this happened, The Turn of the Tide in
the Pacific War holds important lessons for students of military
history and for future strategic leaders.
Historians and other military analysts often use the term
"strategic initiative." Most assume a common understanding of this
term. But the concept has been neither carefully defined nor
examined in depth. This thesis contributes to the elimination of
that gap by answering the question, what factors lead to shifts in
strategic initiative during the conduct of modern, conventional
war? The Russo-German War of 1941-1945 and the Pacific War of
1941-1945 provide the historical evidence for this study. Both
conflicts progressed through three distinct phases in which the
Axis combatant first seized the strategic initiative, the
initiative then fell into dispute, and the initiative eventually
shifted to control of the Allied combatant. Four factors
contributing to strategic initiative have been examined for each
phase of each war: resources, intelligence, strategic acumen, and
operational and tactical methods. These elements of military
effectiveness reflect each nation's war-making capacity, knowledge,
wisdom, and technique. The relative advantages each side enjoyed in
each category have been compared to determine which factors more
significantly influenced shifts in strategic initiative and how
each component acted upon the others. The heart of the study
focuses on the transition into, conduct during, and the transition
from the second phase of each war, where the actual shifts in
initiative occurred. Strategic acumen led the hierarchy of factors
that influence strategic initiative in war. The side that better
matched its goals with its capabilities, took advantage of
opportunities, and planned more realistically reaped the largest
rewards. Good intelligence proved to be a key enabler to the clear
judgments that are the hallmark of strategic acumen and placed
second in the hierarchy. Resources, followed by operational and
tactical methods, placed third and fourth respectively.
Nevertheless, each of these components influenced the possession of
and shifts in strategic ini
The Slovak National Uprising of 1944 is ignored and/ or treated as
a nonevent in the Western historiography of World War II. The
political climate during World War II and the Cold War that
followed obscured and distorted the history and understanding of
this revolt. The raising of the Iron Curtain in the 1990s removed
the veil of secrecy from much of Eastern Europe's wartime history,
and Western historians are exploring the new resources available,
but coverage of Slovakia's story and uprising remains very limited.
This work aims to fill some of the void. Fully understanding the
uprising requires an analysis of a number of different viewpoints
in order to avoid capture by the political views of the parties
involved: the Slovaks, the Germans, or the Soviets. Each group had
different plans and goals: the Slovaks found themselves
precariously between the Allies and Germany, the Germans fought to
maintain their strategic position in central Europe while the
Soviets hoped to expand their influence through eastern and central
Europe. Each group naturally interpreted events differently and
acted accordingly. Ultimately the Germans crushed the Slovak
rebellion. Events surrounding the uprising remain cloudy to this
day. The Slovaks won only short-term political gains, but their
Jewish and ethnic German populations paid a heavy price. The
Germans won their last significant victory in the war and
maintained their presence in Slovak territory until the very end.
The Soviet Union suffered significant casualties, but saw Communist
influence increase in the region. Recriminations swirl around the
lack of Allied support and the duplicity of Stalin. Western
historians have excluded coverage of the uprising in part to avoid
embarrassment. Significantly, the Slovaks remain at odds among
themselves about the importance and the meaning of the uprising.
The Slovak National Uprising of 1944 is ignored and/or treated as a
non-event in Western historiography of World War II. The political
climate during World War II and the Cold War that followed obscured
and distorted the history and understanding of this revolt. The
fall of the 'Iron Curtain' raised the veil of secrecy off much of
Eastern Europe's wartime history and Western historians are
exploring the new resources available, but coverage of Slovakia's
story and uprising remains very limited. This work aims to fill
some of the void.
Historians and other military analysts often use the term
"strategic initiative." Most assume a common understanding of this
term. But the concept has been neither carefully defined nor
examined in depth. This thesis contributes to the elimination of
that gap by answering the question, what factors lead to shifts in
strategic initiative during the conduct of modern, conventional
war?
|
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
Hampstead
Diane Keaton, Brendan Gleeson, …
DVD
R66
Discovery Miles 660
|