|
Showing 1 - 2 of
2 matches in All Departments
What do Hobby Lobby, InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, Wheaton
College, World Vision, the Little Sisters of the Poor, and the
University of Notre Dame have in common? All are faith-based
organizations that have faced pressure to act in ways contrary to
their religious beliefs. In this book, two policy experts show how
faith-based groups--those active in the educational, healthcare,
international aid and development, and social service fields--can
defend their ability to follow their religiously based beliefs
without having to jettison the very faith and faith-based practices
that led them to provide services to those in need. They present a
pluralist vision for religious freedom for faith-based
organizations of all religious traditions. The book includes case
studies that document the challenges faith-based organizations face
to freely follow the practices of their religious traditions and
analyzes these threats as originating in a common, yet erroneous,
set of assumptions and attitudes prevalent in American society. The
book also includes responses by diverse voices--an Orthodox Jew, a
Roman Catholic, two evangelicals, two Islamic leaders, and an
unbeliever who is a religious-freedom advocate--underscoring the
importance of religious freedom for faith-based organizations.
Should welfare be abolished because it fosters dependency, or
should it be expanded to offer more effective help? Are people poor
due to their own irresponsibility or as a result of social
injustice? Is the key welfare problem non-work or illegitimacy?
Should government help the poor, or is aid a job for the church?
Such polarized questions have hampered the quest for constructive
welfare reform and have left Christians criticizing each other as
mere advocates of a bogus compassion or of a "tough love" that
actually lacks love. This book moves beyond such polarities by
developing a fuller biblical understanding of personhood, the
multiple institutions of society, and the limited yet constructive
responsibilities of government. It argues that assistance should
aim to restore people and institutions to their diverse
responsibilities in a healthy society. For shalom to replace
poverty and social decay, families, churches, schools, government,
and other institutions must each fulfill its own responsibilities.
The topics range from family dysfunction to global economic
restructuring, from constitutional disputes about government
support for faith-based charities to social science's confusion
about causation, and from welfare program changes to policy
initiatives to revitalize civil society.
|
|