SEEING THE UNSEEN. GEOPHYSICS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY is a collection of papers presented at the advanced XV International Summer School in Archaeology ?Geophysics for Landscape Archaeology? (Grosseto, Italy, 10-18 July 2006). Bringing together the experience of some of the world's greatest experts in the field of archaeological prospection, the focus of this book is not so much on the analysis of single buried structures, but more on researching the entire landscape in all its multi-period complexity.

The book is divided into two parts. The first part concentrates on the theoretical basis of the various methods, illustrated for the most part through case-studies and practical examples drawn from a variety of geographical and cultural contexts. The second part focuses on the work carried out in the field during the Summer School. Tutors and students took part in the intensive application of the principal techniques of geophysical prospecting (magnetometry, EM, ERT and ground-penetrating radar) to locate, retrieve, process and interpret data for a large Roman villa-complex near Grosseto.

SEEING THE UNSEEN. GEOPHYSICS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY provides a clear illustration of the remarkable potential of geophysical methods in the study of ancient landscapes, and will be usefull to Archaeologists, Geophysicists, Environmental scientists, and those involved in the management of cultural heritage.

SEEING THE UNSEEN. GEOPHYSICS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY is a collection of papers presented at the advanced XV International Summer School in Archaeology 'Geophysics for Landscape Archaeology' (Grosseto, Italy, 10-18 July 2006). Bringing together the experience of some of the world's greatest experts in the field of archaeological prospection, the focus of this book is not so much on the analysis of single buried structures, but more on researching the entire landscape in all its multi-period complexity. The book is divided into two parts. The first part concentrates on the theoretical basis of the various methods, illustrated for the most part through case-studies and practical examples drawn from a variety of geographical and cultural contexts. The second part focuses on the work carried out in the field during the Summer School. Tutors and students took part in the intensive application of the principal techniques of geophysical prospecting (magnetometry, EM, ERT and ground-penetrating radar) to locate, retrieve, process and interpret data for a large Roman villa-complex near Grosseto. SEEING THE UNSEEN. GEOPHYSICS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHAEOLOGY provides a clear illustration of the remarkable potential of geophysical methods in the study of ancient landscapes, and will be usefull to Archaeologists, Geophysicists, Environmental scientists, and those involved in the management of cultural heritage.

This volume debuts the new scope of Remote Sensing, which was first defined as the analysis of data collected by sensors that were not in physical contact with the objects under investigation (using cameras, scanners, and radar systems operating from spaceborne or airborne platforms). A wider characterization is now possible: Remote Sensing can be any non-destructive approach to viewing the buried and nominally invisible evidence of past activity. Spaceborne and airborne sensors, now supplemented by laser scanning, are united using ground-based geophysical instruments and undersea remote sensing, as well as other non-invasive techniques such as surface collection or field-walking survey. Now, any method that enables observation of evidence on or beneath the surface of the earth, without impact on the surviving stratigraphy, is legitimately within the realm of Remote Sensing. The new interfaces and senses engaged in Remote Sensing appear throughout the book. On a philosophical level, this is about the landscapes and built environments that reveal history through place and time. It is about new perspectives-the views of history possible with Remote Sensing and fostered in part by immersive, interactive 3D and 4D environments discussed in this volume. These perspectives are both the result and the implementation of technological, cultural, and epistemological advances in record keeping, interpretation, and conceptualization. Methodology presented here builds on the current ease and speed in collecting data sets on the scale of the object, site, locality, and landscape. As this volume shows, many disciplines surrounding archaeology and related cultural studies are currently involved in Remote Sensing, and its relevance will only increase as the methodology expands.

This volume debuts the new scope of Remote Sensing, which was first defined as the analysis of data collected by sensors that were not in physical contact with the objects under investigation (using cameras, scanners, and radar systems operating from spaceborne or airborne platforms). A wider characterization is now possible: Remote Sensing can be any non-destructive approach to viewing the buried and nominally invisible evidence of past activity. Spaceborne and airborne sensors, now supplemented by laser scanning, are united using ground-based geophysical instruments and undersea remote sensing, as well as other non-invasive techniques such as surface collection or field-walking survey. Now, any method that enables observation of evidence on or beneath the surface of the earth, without impact on the surviving stratigraphy, is legitimately within the realm of Remote Sensing. The new interfaces and senses engaged in Remote Sensing appear throughout the book. On a philosophical level, this is about the landscapes and built environments that reveal history through place and time. It is about new perspectives-the views of history possible with Remote Sensing and fostered in part by immersive, interactive 3D and 4D environments discussed in this volume. These perspectives are both the result and the implementation of technological, cultural, and epistemological advances in record keeping, interpretation, and conceptualization. Methodology presented here builds on the current ease and speed in collecting data sets on the scale of the object, site, locality, and landscape. As this volume shows, many disciplines surrounding archaeology and related cultural studies are currently involved in Remote Sensing, and its relevance will only increase as the methodology expands.

Session VIII-1 of UISPP 2018 in Paris 'Mapping the Past' brought together several contributions reflecting on the need to develop sustainable and reliable approaches to mapping our landscape heritage. The session was guided by the crucial concept termed the 'archaeological continuum'. This concept can be defined as a proactive approach to landscape survey based on the summative evidence detected (or detectable) within the area under examination, reducing spatial and chronological gaps as far as possible through the intensive and extensive application of a wide variety of exploratory methods and analytical techniques. Research work across Europe as well as contributions presented in this session have demonstrated that it is now possible to explore the whole landscape of carefully chosen areas and study them as an archaeological continuum. Archaeological interpretations derived from this kind of approach can be expected to reveal different layers of information belonging to a variety of chronological horizons, each displaying mutual physical (stratigraphic) and conceptual relationships within that horizon. The raising of new archaeological questions and also the development of alternative conservation strategies directly stimulated by the radical ideas inherent in the concept of the 'archaeological continuum' are among the major outcomes of the session.

The book derives from the experiences of the authors as lecturers and tutors at different international summer schools on reality-based surveying and 3D modelling in the field of archaeology and cultural heritage. The book is organized in three main sections. The first part aims to introduce and discuss the contribution of geomatic techniques in archaeology and more generally in cultural heritage with particular attentions to the 3D domain. The second part is focused on the main areas involved in the implementation of 3D surveys (aerial and terrestrial LiDAR, photogrammetry, remote sensing), 3D documentations, GIS and 3D interpretations (virtual and cyber archaeology). The last section collects some relevant case studies showing the extraordinary contribution that geomatic techniques can give to archaeological research and cultural heritage at different scales of detail: object, site, landscape.

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Remote Sensing in Archaeology held in Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India, in August 2009. Contents: 1) Identifying, Mapping and Managing the Unmanageable: the implications of long term multi-sensor research into the archaeology of the Vale of Pickering, Yorkshire, England (D. Powlesland); 2) Pushing the envelope for satellite archaeology in Egypt: Quickbird feature detection, predictive site modeling, and thermal site signatures (S. Parcak); 3) High-resolution, multi-spectral satellite imagery and extensive archaeological prospection: A case study from Apulia, Italy and Kazanlak, Bulgaria (A. Sobotova and S.A. Ross); 4)Archaeological Remote Sensing Approach in Honduras. A Project for Cultural Heritage and Human Habitats Protection (J.G. Rejas et al.); 5) Integrating Sar Data and Hyperspectral Analysis for the Archaeological Survey of the Segeda City, Spain (J.G. Rejas et al.); 6) Wavelet based feature extraction and classification using Differential evolution (R.A. Alagu Raja et al.); 7) Remote Sensing of Ancient Maya Land Use Features at Caracol, Belize Related to Rainforest Canopy Structure (J.F. Weishampel et al.); 8) A Study for Analyzing the Impact of Wavelet Scaling on Satellite Data Classification (R.A. Alagu Raja et al.); 9) Western Han Landscape and Remote Sensing Applications at Xi'an (China) (M. Forte); 10) Terrestrial Remote Sensing in Archaeology (M. K. Tiwari); 11) Ground-Based Icing Condition Remote Sensing System Definition (M. K. Tiwari); 12) The Role of Aerial Photographs for Interpreting Iron Age Communities in Eastern Scotland (A. Brend); 13) Historic aerial photography for archaeology and heritage management (D. Cowley and L. Ferguson); 14 Towards an improved archaeological record through the use of airborne laser scanning (O. Risb); 15) LiDAR surveys of ancient landscapes in SW Germany: Assessment of archaeological features under forests and attempts for automatic pattern recognition (B. Sittler and J. Heinzel); 16) Application of multispectral remote sensing imagery in detection of enclosure walls of ancient settlements in South India (M.B. Rajani and S. Settar); 17) Interpreting Aerial Imagery - developing best practice (R. Palmer and D. Cowley); 18) Worldview: the importance of diversity in human (spatial) thinking (J. Van der Elst); 19) To reconcile water and fire? Some discourse issues on the interpretation of aerial images (W. Raczkowski); 20) Geomatics techniques for the 3D documentation and visualization of archaeological building (S. Campana et al.); 21) Digital Videography: Recording, Preserving, and Disseminating Archaeological Data (M.K. Tiwaria); 22) Digital Photo Documentation of murals at Brihadisvara Temple, Tanjavur: A tool for Art Historians (P.S. Sriraman); 23) The importance of precision in georeferencing demonstrated in the case study of archaeological GIS of Chitradurga, Karnataka (N.S. Nalinia and M.B. Rajani); 24) Semi-Automated Data Capture and Image Processing: new routes to interactive 3D models (K. Galor and D.H. Sanders); 25) CENOBIUM - Putting together the Romanesque Cloister Capitals of the Mediterranean Region (M. Dellepiane et al.); 26) The Virtual Museum of the Western Han Dynasty: 3D Documentation and Interpretation (M. Forte et al); 27) The 'Cultural Heritage Map of Apulia' Project (A. Buglione et al); 28) Remote Sensing and GIS Application in the Management and Conservation of Heritage properties at Agra (D. Dayalan); 29) Digital Documentation of Buddhist Sites in Tamil Nadu (D. Dayalan); 30) Conservation and Environmental Issues of Taj Mahal (D. Dayalan); 31) Use of Re-projected Photos in the Conservation of the Order's Castle in Cesis (Latvia) (A. Lapins); 32) Damage documentation in shore temple Mahabalipuram India (A. Padma); 33) Rethinking Cultural Heritage: The Interface between Cultural and Natural Heritage in Protected Areas - multi media project (N. McClean); 34) Culture of Excavation and Sculptural Geometry of the Ground (C. Pozzi); 34) A Forgotten Heritage: Impact Assessment Studies at Prehistoric Sites in Tamil Nadu (S. Pappu); 35) Heritage Management on Mattancherry Palace, Kochi, Kerala (India) - a case study (K.K. Ramamurthy and K.P. Mohandas); 36) Pattanam Excavations and Explorations 2007 & 2008: An Overview (P.J. Cherian); 37) Resolution Invariant Content Based Retrieval of Artistic Images (S. Bama et al.); 38) Socio-economic impact assessment as a strategic management tool for heritage sites (J. Kaminski); 39) Geospatial database of Ahichchatra using Geoinformatics (A. Tare et al.); 40) Geoarchaeology of Central West Coast of India (B.R. Manjunatha); 41) Detection and Excavation of Remains of Underground Burial by Geophysics and Remote Sensing Methods (J. Peng et al.); 42) Reconstruction possibilities of the ancient Roman villas - based on air photographs, geodesical and geophysical surveys (A. Firnigl); 43) Application of Integrated Digital Technologies in the Study of Settlement archaeology of Kausambi Region (S.S. Rai); 44) Investigating Megalithic Astronomy: the role of remote sensing (S.M. Menon and M.N. Vahia); 45) Chronological Aspects of Functioning of the Set of North Indian Early Mediaeval Epigraphic Sources (A.A. Stolyarov); 46) The Archaeology of Ritual Spaces: Satellite Images and Early Chalukyan Temples (H.P. Ray); 47) Recent Applications of Archaeological Remote Sensing in Cambodia: An Overview (D. Evans); 48) Archaeology and landscape features in Magnetometer Data (M. Posselt and I. Heske); 49) Digital Historical atlas of South India (F. Borne et al); 50) Documentation and visualization of archaeological data (A. Pillai et al.); 51) Mapping Archaeological Sites of Tamil Nadu (K. Rajan); 52) An "Encyclopedia of Archaeological Heritage"? The Encyclopedia of Life as a model for digital cultural atlases (S.A. Ross); 53) Computer tools for creation of electronic atlases of the historical monuments state (S.B. Shchigorets et al.); 54) Dynamical mapping of migration of communities - Challenges and Issues (P. Sumabala); 55) Management of material heritage information: structured repository for travelers annotations over a qualified caravanserais inventory (C. Tavernari et al.); 56) A digital data-base for Iconography, Architecture and Epigraphy in the Pondicherry Centre of the Ecole francaise d'Extreme-Orient (V. Gillet).

In 2001, UNESCO and the European Space Agency (ESA) launched the aeOpen Initiative on the Use of Space Technologies to Monitor Natural and Cultural Heritage of UNESCO SitesAe. The aeOpen InitiativeAe is a framework of cooperation to assist countries to improve the observation, monitoring and management of natural and cultural sites as well as of their surroundings, through space technologies. In this field of operations a group of experts, called International Working Group of Space Technologies for World Heritage, was created under the coordination of UNESCO, the present membership including representatives of CNR-ITABC (Italy), GORS (Syria), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (China), NASA (US), ETH (Switzerland) and other European research centres and institutions. At the Beijing conference the topics discussed demonstrated clearly that the concept of Remote Sensing was significantly wider than in the past and involved the integration of numerous different technologies and fields of application: photogrammetry, air photography, air-photo mapping, airborne multi-spectral and thermal imagery, satellite imagery, geophysics, GIS but also, laser scanning, visualization displays, space models virtual reality. This conference at Rome in December 2006, building on these ideas, will aim to continue in this direction, promoting the use of integrated methodologies in remote sensing archaeology so as to help in the creation of new and sustainable policies in the monitoring, interpretation, fruition and communication of the cultural heritage. Including 67 papers from 10 sessions: SESSION 1: Satellite Remote Sensing Archaeology; SESSION 2: Aerial Archaeology: vertical ans oblique photography; SESSION 3: Aerial Archaeology: airborne scanning; SESSION 4: Ground-Based Remote Sensing Archaeology; SESSION 5: Integrated Technologies for Remote Sensing in Archaeology; SESSION 6: Interpreting Landscapes and Settlement Pattern Reconstruction; SESSION 7: Environment Analysis for Remote Sensing Archaeology; SESSION 8: 3D Visualization of Place and Landscapes; SESSION 9: Virtual Archaeological Reconstruction; SESSION 10: Landscapes, CRM and Ethics: POSTER SESSIONS.

This volume brings together all the successful peer-reviewed papers submitted for the proceedings of the 43rd conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology that took place in Siena (Italy) from March 31st to April 2nd 2015. Altogether, within the four days of the conference 280 papers were presented in 48 sections divided into ten macro topics, 113 posters, 7 roundtables and 12 workshops. That number, in itself, has prompted a thought or two. Above all it says that CAA is very much alive and kicking, that it is in robust good health, and that it remains a wholly relevant force in the scientific community, fully engaged with the questions of the day, and a continuing focal point for the profession. All of that speaks well for the motto of CAA 2015: KEEP THE REVOLUTION GOING. Although the significance of the motto is obvious, it is worth some thoughts. Few would deny that in the past 30 years or so, digital technologies have profoundly revolutionised archaeology - in the office and laboratory, in the field and in the classroom. The progressive introduction of digital techniques in the archaeological process has of course led to a general increase in efficiency. But perhaps more importantly it has provided a spur to the discussion of methodology and through that has strongly influenced not only the way we go about things but also the outcomes that we have been able to achieve. The pioneering phase in the application of digital techniques in archaeological research has clearly been fruitful and today computer applications such as GIS, databases, remote sensing and spatial analysis as well as virtual and cyber archaeology are deeply embedded within our universities. This is all good, of course, but we must not assume that the task has been completed. An intrinsic revolutionary instinct towards technological development has been awakened. But it will only survive by virtue of the results that it brings about. Or using the words of our Chairman Prof Gary Lock: 'Computers not only change the way we do things, but more importantly they change the way we think about what we do and why we do it'. The general thrust of this statement can be summed up and reinforced by recalling a quote from the philosopher Don Ihde, who has argued we should never forget that all technologies should be regarded as 'cultural instruments', which as well as strategies and methodologies implemented in our researches are also 'non-neutral'. So KEEP THE REVOLUTION GOING! is a motto that lays stress on the need to maintain innovation in archaeology through technological advances. But innovation must have at its root the fostering of critical thought and the framing of new archaeological questions. So there is much work still to be done, and fresh challenges to be faced in the months, years and decades ahead. -from the introduction by Stefano Campana and Roberto Scopigno