|
Showing 1 - 1 of
1 matches in All Departments
In 2010, NATO decided to expand its ballistic missile defense
program, in part because of the American offer to include its
European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) as the centerpiece of an
expanded effort. For the Allies' part, few have actually
contributed tangible ballistic missile defense assets, in terms of
missile interceptors, radars or other sensors, or ballistic missile
defense-related platforms. This is likely to have significant
implications for the U.S. Army, which has an important but largely
underappreciated role in NATO missile defense today. In particular,
the Army is likely to face increased manpower demands, materiel
requirements, and training needs in order to meet the demand signal
created by the NATO ballistic missile defense program.
Additionally, Army units involved directly in or in support of
ballistic missile defense are likely to face a higher OPTEMPO than
currently projected. Ultimately, this will exacerbate the perceived
imbalance in transatlantic burden-sharing...
|
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.