|
Showing 1 - 5 of
5 matches in All Departments
Costs Law Reports is the one authoritative source of costs law
reporting. It includes important criminal decisions of Costs
Judges, many of which are not available elsewhere. Cases included
in this part: NJ Rickard Ltd v Holloway and Another [2017] 1 Costs
LR 1; Powles and Another v Reeves and Others [2017] 1 Costs LR 19;
Taylor v Honiton Town Council and Another [2017] 1 Costs LR 31;
Pollard v University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust [2017] 1
Costs LR 45; MR v SR and Another [2017] Costs LR 71; R v Patel
(Hitendra) [2017] 1 Costs LR 77; Merrix v Heart of England NHS
Foundation Trust [2017] 1 Costs LR 91; Sharp v Leeds City Council
[2017] 1 Costs LR 129; Lord Chancellor v Edward Hayes LLP and
Another [2017] 1 Costs LR 147; Thompson v Director of Legal Aid
Casework [2017] 1 Costs LR 163; R (Haigh) v City of Westminster
Magistrates' Court and Others [2017] 1 Costs LR 175; AZ and Others
v Kirklees Council; and Re CZ (Human Rights Claim: Costs) [2017] 1
Costs LR 201.
Costs Law Reports is the one authoritative source of costs law
reporting. It frequently includes important criminal decisions of
Costs Judges, many of which are not available elsewhere. Cases
included in this part: Ayton v RSM Bentley Jennison [2018] 5 Costs
LR 915; R (The Law Society) v The Lord Chancellor [2018] 5 Costs LR
937; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v Jackson [2018] 5 Costs LR 987;
Welsh v Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust [2018] 5 Costs LR 1025;
Culliford v Thorpe [2018] 5 Costs LR 1039; Conversant Wireless
Licensing SARL v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd [2018] 5 Costs LR 1049;
Griffin v Higgs [2018] 5 Costs LR 1061; Devoy-Williams v Hugh
Cartwright & Amin [2018] 5 Costs LR 1105; Hosking v Apax
Partners LLP [2018] 5 Costs LR 1125; Gill v Heer Manak Solicitors
[2018] 5 Costs LR 1165; Yirenki v Ministry of Defence [2018] 5
Costs LR 1177; and Slade (t/a Richard Slade and Company) v Boodia
[2018] 5 Costs LR 1185.
Costs Law Reports is the one authoritative source of costs law
reporting. It frequently includes important criminal decisions of
Costs Judges, many of which are not available elsewhere. Cases
included in this part: Retailers v Visa (Application in Private)
[2018] 6 Costs LR 1203; Parker Lloyd Capital Ltd v Edwardian Group
Ltd [2018] 6 Costs LR 1235; WG v HG [2018] 6 Costs LR 1247; Link Up
Mitaka Ltd t/a THEBIGWORD v Language Empire Ltd [2018] 6 Costs LR
1279; Kent v Paterson-Brown [2018] 6 Costs LR 1289; Bank St
Petersburg PJSC v Arkhangelsky [2018] 6 Costs LR 1303; R (Kay) v
Scan-Thors (UK) Ltd [2018] 6 Costs LR 1317; Ogiehor v Belinfantie
[2018] 6 Costs LR 1329; RJ v HB [2018] 6 Costs LR 1347; Rotam
Agrochemical Company Ltd v GAT Microencapsulation GMBH [2018] 6
Costs LR 1365; Warren v Hill Dickinson LLP [2018] 6 Costs LR 1377;
and NJL v PTE [2018] 6 Costs LR 1389.
Costs Law Reports is the one authoritative source of costs law
reporting. It frequently includes important criminal decisions of
Costs Judges, many of which are not available elsewhere. Cases
included in this part: Hanley v J C & A Solicitors; Green v SGI
Legal LLP [2018] 4 Costs LR 693; Accident Exchange Ltd v McLean
[2018] 4 Costs LR 713; Tuson v Murphy [2018] 4 Costs LR 733; R
(Adath Yisroel Burial Society) v HM Senior Coroner for Inner North
London [2018] 4 Costs LR 749; Holmes v West London Mental Health
NHS Trust [2018] 4 Costs LR 763; PJSC Aeroflot - Russian Airlines v
Leeds [2018] 4 Costs LR 775; Catalyst Management Services v Libya
Africa Investment Portfolio [2018] 4 Costs LR 807; FPH Law (a Firm)
v Brown (t/a Integrum Law) [2018] 4 Costs LR 823; R (Faulkner) v
Director of Legal Aid Casework [2018] 4 Costs LR 841; Chernukhin v
Danilina [2018] 4 Costs LR 859; Hertel v Saunders [2018] 4 Costs LR
879; and The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Brown; The
Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police v Brown [2018] 4 Costs
LR 897.
Costs Law Reports is the one authoritative source of costs law
reporting. It frequently includes important criminal decisions of
Costs Judges, many of which are not available elsewhere. Cases
included in this part: Angel Group Ltd v Davey [2018] 2 Costs LR
199; Iraqi Civilians v Ministry of Defence [2018] 2 Costs LR 213;
Marcura Equities FZE v Nisomar Ventures Ltd [2018] 2 Costs LR 227;
Siddiqui v The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University
of Oxford [2018] 2 Costs LR 247; Herbert v HH Law Ltd [2018] 2
Costs LR 261; JMX (a Child by His Mother and Litigation Friend,
FMX) v Norfolk and Norwich Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2018] 2
Costs LR 285; Leibson Corporation v TOC Investments Corporation
[2018] 2 Costs LR 293; Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd v Sarens (UK) Ltd
[2018] 2 Costs LR 333; Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven
Insurance Company Ltd [2018] 2 Costs LR 347; Ali v Channel 5
Broadcast Ltd [2018] 2 Costs LR 373; Williams v The Secretary of
State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy [2018] 2 Costs
LR 391; and R v MA [2018] 2 Costs LR 419.
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.