This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book. ++++ The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification: ++++ The Tomb Of Siphtah: The Monkey Tomb And The Gold Tomb. The Discovery Of The Tombs; Theodore M. Davis' Excavations. Excavations In The Tombs Of The Kings; Volume 4 Of Theodore M. Davis' Excavations: Biban El Moluk Theodore M. Davis, Gaston Maspero, Edward Russell Ayrton, George Daressy, E. Harold Jones A. Constable and co., ltd., 1908 History; Ancient; Egypt; History / Ancient / Egypt; Social Science / Archaeology; Thebes (Egypt: Ancient city); Thebes (Egypt: Extinct city); Tombs; Valley of the Kings (Egypt)

The funeral papyrus of Iouiya is a good specimen of the Book of the Dead of the XVlIIth dynasty. We know its date. It is of the time of Amenophis III, the last king before the religious revolution of Akhouenaten. It measures 9 metres 70 c.m. and contains forty chapters, one of which is unknown. It is written, like all the copies of the Book of the Dead of that time, in linear hieroglyphics, which are not perfect, but which are a transition towards hieratic. The vignettes illustrating a certain number of the chapters are beautifully drawn and coloured. It certainly is a choice document, which is in accordance with the high rank of the deceased. Judging from the papyri of that epoch which have been preserved, we can see that what gave to those documents their value in the estimation of the old Egyptians, was in the first place the vignettes. It was that which they mostly cared for; the text might be more or less neglected, since probably a few only of the people who saw it could read it; besides, the scribes knew that it was to be hidden in a tomb, where only the ka would look at it. Generally speaking, the beauty of the vignettes runs counter to the goodness of the text; in papyri written with care and by copyists who were not mere workmen; such as those of Nebseni or Nu, in the British Museum, the vignettes, though well drawn, have no colour, they are less numerous, and are something secondary. This papyrus is an exception in that way; though being beautifully illustrated, the text is good. Nevertheless, the parts which are inferior to the rest of the document are precisely those where there are beautiful vignettes. As they were made first, and as sufficient space had not been reserved for the text to which they belonged, there are omissions, or the chapter is sometimes curtailed.

This is the original 1906 report on the excavation of Hatshepsut's tomb by Howard Carter, who later discovered the tomb of Tutankhamen. Edouard Naville, who excavated her Funerary Temple at Deir El Bahari, contributed a biography of Hatshepsut for this volume.