|
|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
On the Nature of Marx's Things is a major rethinking of the Marxian
tradition, one based not on fixed things but on the inextricable
interrelation between the material world and our language for it.
Lezra traces to Marx's earliest writings a subterranean, Lucretian
practice that he calls necrophilological translation that continues
to haunt Marx's inheritors. This Lucretian strain, requiring that
we think materiality in non-self-evident ways, as dynamic,
aleatory, and always marked by its relation to language, raises
central questions about ontology, political economy, and reading.
"Lezra," writes Vittorio Morfino in his preface, "transfers all of
the power of the Althusserian encounter into his conception of
translation." Lezra's expansive understanding of translation covers
practices that put different natural and national languages into
relation, often across periods, but also practices or mechanisms
internal to each language. Obscured by later critical attention to
the contradictory lexicons-of fetishism and of chrematistics-that
Capital uses to describe how value accrues to commodities, and by
the dialectical approach that's framed Marx's work since Engels
sought to marry it to the natural philosophy of his time,
necrophilological translation has a troubling, definitive influence
in Marx's thought and in his wake. It entails a radical revision of
what counts as translation, and wholly new ways of imagining what
an object is, of what counts as matter, value, sovereignty,
mediation, and even number. In On the Nature of Marx's Things a
materialism "of the encounter," as recent criticism in the vein of
the late Althusser calls it, encounters Marxological value-form
theory, post-Schmittian divisible sovereignty,
object-oriented-ontologies and the critique of correlationism, and
philosophies of translation and untranslatability in debt to Quine,
Cassin, and Derrida. The inheritors of the problems with which Marx
grapples range from Spinoza's marranismo, through Melville's
Bartleby, through the development of a previously unexplored
Freudian political theology shaped by the revolutionary traditions
of Schiller and Verdi, through Adorno's exilic antihumanism against
Said's cosmopolitan humanism, through today's new materialisms.
Ultimately, necrophilology draws the story of capital's capture of
difference away from the story of capital's production of
subjectivity. It affords concepts and procedures for dismantling
the system of objects on which neoliberal capitalism stands:
concrete, this-wordly things like commodities, but also such
"objects" as debt traps, austerity programs, the marketization of
risk; ideologies; the pedagogical, professional, legal, even
familial institutions that produce and reproduce inequities today.
Plural Temporalities traces out a dynamic historical relationship
between the texts of Spinoza and Althusser. It interrogates
Spinoza's thought through Althusser's and vice versa, with the
intention of opening new horizons for the question of materialism.
From the fragmentary intuitions Althusser produced about Spinoza
throughout his life, Morfino builds a new and comprehensive
interpretation of Spinoza's philosophy.
Vittorio Morfino draws out the implications of the dynamic
Spinoza-Machiavelli encounter by focusing on the concepts of
causality, temporality and politics. This allows him to think
through the relationship between ontology and politics, leading to
an understanding of history as a complex and plural interweaving of
different rhythms.
Can the Marxist tradition still provide new resources for
understanding the specificity of historical time? This volume
proposes to transform our understanding of Marxism by reconnecting
with the 'subterranean currents' of plural temporalities that have
traversed its development. From Rousseau and Sieyes to Marx, from
Bloch to Althusser, from Gramsci to Pasolini and postcolonialism,
the chapters in this volume seek both to valorise neglected
resources from Marxism's contradictory history, and also to read
against the grain its orthodox and heterodox currents.
Vittorio Morfino draws out the implications of the dynamic
Spinoza-Machiavelli encounter by focusing on the concepts of
causality, temporality and politics. This allows him to think
through the relationship between ontology and politics, leading to
an understanding of history as a complex and plural interweaving of
different rhythms.
In The Radical Machiavelli: Politics, Philosophy and Language, some
of the finest Machiavellian scholars explore the Florentine's
thought five hundred years after the composition of his
masterpiece, The Prince. Their analysis, however, goes past The
Prince, extending to Machiavelli's entire corpus and shining new
light on his political, historical, and military works, with a
special focus on their heritage in modern Marxist thought, the
arena in which they reverberate most profoundly and originally.
Rather than a neutral, comprehensive, and safe interpretation, this
book offers a partial and even partisan reading of Machiavelli, the
16th-century thinker who continues to divide scholars and
interpreters, forcing them to confront their responsibility as
contemporary thinkers in a global society where Machiavelli's ideas
and the issues they address still matter. Contributors are: Etienne
Balibar, Banu Bargu, Jeremie Barthas, Thomas Berns, Alison Brown,
Filippo Del Lucchese, Romain Descendre, Jean-Louis Fournel, Fabio
Frosini, Giorgio Inglese, Mikko Lahtinen, Jacques Lezra, John P.
McCormick, Warren Montag, Vittorio Morfino, Mohamed Moulfi,
Gabriele Pedulla, Tania Rispoli, Peter D. Thomas, Sebastian Torres,
Miguel Vatter, Stefano Visentin, Yves Winter, and Jean-Claude
Zancarini.
|
|