![]() |
![]() |
Your cart is empty |
||
Showing 1 - 16 of 16 matches in All Departments
A variety of scientific disciplines have set as their task explaining mental activities, recognizing that in some way these activities depend upon our brain. But, until recently, the opportunities to conduct experiments directly on our brains were limited. As a result, research efforts were split between disciplines such as cognitive psychology, linguistics, and artificial intelligence that investigated behavior, while disciplines such as neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and genetics experimented on the brains of non-human animals. In recent decades these disciplines integrated, and with the advent of techniques for imaging activity in human brains, the term cognitive neuroscience has been applied to the integrated investigations of mind and brain. This book is a philosophical examination of how these disciplines continue in the mission of explaining our mental capacities.
A variety of scientific disciplines have set as their task explaining mental activities, recognizing that in some way these activities depend upon our brain. But, until recently, the opportunities to conduct experiments directly on our brains were limited. As a result, research efforts were split between disciplines such as cognitive psychology, linguistics, and artificial intelligence that investigated behavior while disciplines such as neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and genetics experimented on the brains of non-human animals. In recent decades these disciplines integrated, and with the advent of techniques for imaging activity in human brains, the term cognitive neuroscience has been applied to the integrated investigations of mind and brain. This book is a philosophical examination of how these disciplines continue in the mission of explaining our mental capacities.
In the past 15 years a host of critical thinking books have appeared that teach students to find flaws in the arguments of others by learning to detect a number of informal fallacies. This book is not in that tradition. The authors of this book believe that while students learn to become vicious critics, they still continue to make the very mistakes they criticize in others. Thus, this book has adopted the approach of teaching the construction of good arguments first and then introducing criticism as a secondary skill. Moreover, the emphasis of the book is not on learning to name fallacies, but on being able to identify weaknesses in an argument so as to be able to construct an effective critique of that argument. The book is accompanied by a workbook featuring a wealth of examples to help students acquire the material.
In the past 15 years a host of critical thinking books have
appeared that teach students to find flaws in the arguments of
others by learning to detect a number of informal fallacies. This
book is not in that tradition. The authors of this book believe
that while students learn to become vicious critics, they still
continue to make the very mistakes they criticize in others. Thus,
this book has adopted the approach of teaching the construction of
good arguments first and then introducing criticism as a secondary
skill. Moreover, the emphasis of the book is not on learning to
name fallacies, but on being able to identify weaknesses in an
argument so as to be able to construct an effective critique of
that argument. The book is accompanied by a workbook featuring a
wealth of examples to help students acquire the material.
In the past 15 years a host of critical thinking books have
appeared that teach students to find flaws in the arguments of
others by learning to detect a number of informal fallacies. This
book is not in that tradition. The authors of this book believe
that while students learn to become vicious critics, they still
continue to make the very mistakes they criticize in others. Thus,
this book has adopted the approach of teaching the construction of
good arguments first and then introducing criticism as a secondary
skill. Moreover, the emphasis of the book is not on learning to
name fallacies, but on being able to identify weaknesses in an
argument so as to be able to construct an effective critique of
that argument. The book is accompanied by a workbook featuring a
wealth of examples to help students acquire the material.
This text focuses on two major issues: the nature of scientific
inquiry and the relations between scientific disciplines. Designed
to introduce the basic issues and concepts in the philosophy of
science, Bechtel writes for an audience with little or no
philosophical background.
Specifically designed to make the philosophy of mind intelligible
to those not trained in philosophy, this book provides a concise
overview for students and researchers in the cognitive sciences.
Emphasizing the relevance of philosophical work to investigations
in other cognitive sciences, this unique text examines such issues
as the meaning of language, the mind-body problem, the
functionalist theories of cognition, and intentionality. As he
explores the philosophical issues, Bechtel draws connections
between philosophical views and theoretical and experimental work
in such disciplines as cognitive psychology, artificial
intelligence, linguistics, neuroscience, and anthropology.
Specifically designed to make the philosophy of mind intelligible
to those not trained in philosophy, this book provides a concise
overview for students and researchers in the cognitive sciences.
Emphasizing the relevance of philosophical work to investigations
in other cognitive sciences, this unique text examines such issues
as the meaning of language, the mind-body problem, the
functionalist theories of cognition, and intentionality. As he
explores the philosophical issues, Bechtel draws connections
between philosophical views and theoretical and experimental work
in such disciplines as cognitive psychology, artificial
intelligence, linguistics, neuroscience, and anthropology.
This text focuses on two major issues: the nature of scientific inquiry and the relations between scientific disciplines. Designed to introduce the basic issues and concepts in the philosophy of science, Bechtel writes for an audience with little or no philosophical background. The first part of the book explores the legacy of Logical Positivism and the subsequent post-Positivistic developments in the philosophy of science. The second section examines arguments for and against using a model of theory reduction to integrate scientific disciplines. The book concludes with a chapter describing non-reductionist approaches for relating scientific disciplines using psycholinguistic and cognitive neuroscience models.
In the past 15 years a host of critical thinking books have
appeared that teach students to find flaws in the arguments of
others by learning to detect a number of informal fallacies. This
book is not in that tradition. The authors of this book believe
that while students learn to become vicious critics, they still
continue to make the very mistakes they criticize in others. Thus,
this book has adopted the approach of teaching the construction of
good arguments first and then introducing criticism as a secondary
skill. Moreover, the emphasis of the book is not on learning to
name fallacies, but on being able to identify weaknesses in an
argument so as to be able to construct an effective critique of
that argument. The book is accompanied by a workbook featuring a
wealth of examples to help students acquire the material.
Interdisciplinary research has been a popular idea with many people in the last 20 years. Academic administrators have admonished their faculty to become more interdisciplinary. Students often request the chance to pursue an interdisciplinary degree. While the issue of managing interdisciplinary projects has received a fair amount of attention by those interested in science management, interdisciplinary research has received little attention from historians, philosophers or sociologists of science or from scientists themselves. Yet, there l;lre a number of cases within the life sciences where researchers have been actively engaged in endeavors that take them across disciplinary boundaries. These are ripe for investigation by those interested in the process of science. To provide an in-depth study of some historical or contemporary cases of cross disciplinary research activity in the life sciences, a conference was held at Georgia State University in May, 1984. This conference was supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (U. S. A. ) through their research conference program. Over a three-day period historians, philosophers, and researchers who were actively engaged in various of the life sciences discussed specific examples of interdisciplinary research and tried to analyze what was needed for successful crossing of disciplinary boundaries. After the conference, each of the participants revised their original presentations, partly in light of the discussion at the conference. The papers in this volume are the fruits of that endeavor."
An analysis of two heuristic strategies for the development of mechanistic models, illustrated with historical examples from the life sciences. In Discovering Complexity, William Bechtel and Robert Richardson examine two heuristics that guided the development of mechanistic models in the life sciences: decomposition and localization. Drawing on historical cases from disciplines including cell biology, cognitive neuroscience, and genetics, they identify a number of "choice points" that life scientists confront in developing mechanistic explanations and show how different choices result in divergent explanatory models. Describing decomposition as the attempt to differentiate functional and structural components of a system and localization as the assignment of responsibility for specific functions to specific structures, Bechtel and Richardson examine the usefulness of these heuristics as well as their fallibility-the sometimes false assumption underlying them that nature is significantly decomposable and hierarchically organized. When Discovering Complexity was originally published in 1993, few philosophers of science perceived the centrality of seeking mechanisms to explain phenomena in biology, relying instead on the model of nomological explanation advanced by the logical positivists (a model Bechtel and Richardson found to be utterly inapplicable to the examples from the life sciences in their study). Since then, mechanism and mechanistic explanation have become widely discussed. In a substantive new introduction to this MIT Press edition of their book, Bechtel and Richardson examine both philosophical and scientific developments in research on mechanistic models since 1993.
This Element provides a comprehensive introduction to philosophy of neuroscience. It covers such topics as how neuroscientists procure knowledge, including not just research techniques but the use of various model organisms. It presents examples of knowledge acquired in neuroscience that are then employed to discuss more philosophical topics such as the nature of explanations developed in neuroscience, the different conception of levels employed in discussions of neuroscience, and the invocation of representations in neuroscience explanations. The text emphasizes the importance of brain processes beyond those in the neocortex and then explores what makes processing in neocortex different. It consider the view that the nervous system consists of control mechanisms and considers arguments for hierarchical vs. heterarchical organization of control mechanisms. It concludes by considering implications of findings in neuroscience for how humans conceive of themselves and practices such as embracing norms.
Between 1940 and 1970 pioneers in the new field of cell biology discovered the operative parts of cells and their contributions to cell life. They offered mechanistic accounts that explained cellular phenomena by identifying the relevant parts of cells, the biochemical operations they performed, and the way in which these parts and operations were organised to accomplish important functions. Cell biology was a revolutionary science but in this book it also provides fuel for yet another revolution, one that focuses on the very conception of science itself. Laws have traditionally been regarded as the primary vehicle of explanation, but in the emerging philosophy of science it is mechanisms that do the explanatory work. Bechtel emphasises how mechanisms were discovered, focusing especially on the way in which new instruments made these inquiries possible. He also describes how new journals and societies provided institutional structure to this new enterprise.
Between 1940 and 1970 pioneers in the new field of cell biology discovered the operative parts of cells and their contributions to cell life. They offered mechanistic accounts that explained cellular phenomena by identifying the relevant parts of cells, the biochemical operations they performed, and the way in which these parts and operations were organised to accomplish important functions. Cell biology was a revolutionary science but in this book it also provides fuel for yet another revolution, one that focuses on the very conception of science itself. Laws have traditionally been regarded as the primary vehicle of explanation, but in the emerging philosophy of science it is mechanisms that do the explanatory work. Bechtel emphasises how mechanisms were discovered, focusing especially on the way in which new instruments made these inquiries possible. He also describes how new journals and societies provided institutional structure to this new enterprise.
|
![]() ![]() You may like...
Harry Potter: Complete 8-Film Collection
Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, …
DVD
|