|
Showing 1 - 6 of
6 matches in All Departments
Full Title: "Francis A. Lazenby, suing on behalf of himself etc.,
Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, John B. Ramsey, et al.,
Intervenors-Appellants-Respondents, against International Cotton
Mills Corporation, et al.,
Defendants-Respondents-Appellants"Description: "The Making of the
Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926" collection provides descriptions of
the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial
documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs
and arguments and more. Readers can delve into sensational trials
as well as those precedent-setting trials associated with key
constitutional and historical issues and discover, including the
Amistad Slavery case, the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey"
trial."Trials" provides unfiltered narrative into the lives of the
trial participants as well as everyday people, providing an
unparalleled source for the historical study of sex, gender, class,
marriage and divorce.++++The below data was compiled from various
identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title.
This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure
edition identification: ++++Court RecordHarvard Law School
Libraryc.1915
Full Title: "Francis A. Lazenby, suing on behalf of himself etc.,
Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, John B. Ramsey, et, al.,
Intervenors-Appellants-Respondents, against International Cotton
Mills Corporation, et al,
Defendants-Respondents-Appellants"Description: "The Making of the
Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926" collection provides descriptions of
the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial
documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs
and arguments and more. Readers can delve into sensational trials
as well as those precedent-setting trials associated with key
constitutional and historical issues and discover, including the
Amistad Slavery case, the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey"
trial."Trials" provides unfiltered narrative into the lives of the
trial participants as well as everyday people, providing an
unparalleled source for the historical study of sex, gender, class,
marriage and divorce.++++The below data was compiled from various
identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title.
This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure
edition identification: ++++Court RecordHarvard Law School
Libraryc.1915
Full Title: "Francis A. Lazenby, Etc., Plaintiff, against
International Cotton Mills Corporation, Impleaded, and Others,
Defendants."Description: "The Making of the Modern Law: Trials,
1600-1926" collection provides descriptions of the major trials
from over 300 years, with official trial documents, unofficially
published accounts of the trials, briefs and arguments and more.
Readers can delve into sensational trials as well as those
precedent-setting trials associated with key constitutional and
historical issues and discover, including the Amistad Slavery case,
the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey" trial."Trials" provides
unfiltered narrative into the lives of the trial participants as
well as everyday people, providing an unparalleled source for the
historical study of sex, gender, class, marriage and
divorce.++++The below data was compiled from various identification
fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is
provided as an additional tool in helping to insure edition
identification: ++++01/29/1915Court RecordHarvard Law School
Library1915
Full Title: "Francis A. Lazenby, Suing on Behalf of himself etc.,
Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, John B. Ramsey, Et al.,
Interdenors-Appellants-Respondents, Against International Cotton
Mills Corporation, Et al.,
Defendants-Respondents-Appellants"Description: "The Making of the
Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926" collection provides descriptions of
the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial
documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs
and arguments and more. Readers can delve into sensational trials
as well as those precedent-setting trials associated with key
constitutional and historical issues and discover, including the
Amistad Slavery case, the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey"
trial."Trials" provides unfiltered narrative into the lives of the
trial participants as well as everyday people, providing an
unparalleled source for the historical study of sex, gender, class,
marriage and divorce.++++The below data was compiled from various
identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title.
This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure
edition identification: ++++Court RecordHarvard Law School
Libraryc.1915
In 1998, the United States Department of Justice and state
antitrust agencies charged that Microsoft was monopolizing the
market for personal computer operating systems by suppressing a
competitive threat from Netscape's web browser and Sun
Microsystems' Java technologies. After a celebrated trial, the
government won a partial victory, and federal courts issued a
series of important decisions that inspired scores of follow-on
suits by consumers, rivals, and foreign enforcement agencies.
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka's "The Microsoft Case" examines
the implications of this momentous litigation from the perspective
of consumer welfare. Tracing the development of the case from its
conceptual origins through the trial and the key decisions on both
liability and remedies, this book evaluates the defining antitrust
litigation of our era. The authors argue that, at critical points,
the legal system failed consumers by overrating government's
ability to influence outcomes in a dynamic market. This ambitious
book is essential reading for business, law, and economics scholars
as well as anyone else interested in the ways that technology,
economics, and antitrust law have interacted in the digital age.
In 1998, the United States Department of Justice and state
antitrust agencies charged that Microsoft was monopolizing the
market for personal computer operating systems by suppressing a
competitive threat from Netscape's web browser and Sun
Microsystems' Java technologies. After a celebrated trial, the
government won a partial victory, and federal courts issued a
series of important decisions that inspired scores of follow-on
suits by consumers, rivals, and foreign enforcement agencies.
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka's "The Microsoft Case" examines
the implications of this momentous litigation from the perspective
of consumer welfare. Tracing the development of the case from its
conceptual origins through the trial and the key decisions on both
liability and remedies, this book evaluates the defining antitrust
litigation of our era. The authors argue that, at critical points,
the legal system failed consumers by overrating government's
ability to influence outcomes in a dynamic market. This ambitious
book is essential reading for business, law, and economics scholars
as well as anyone else interested in the ways that technology,
economics, and antitrust law have interacted in the digital age.
|
You may like...
Midnights
Taylor Swift
CD
R418
Discovery Miles 4 180
Loot
Nadine Gordimer
Paperback
(2)
R398
R330
Discovery Miles 3 300
|