0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Browse All Departments
  • All Departments
Price
  • R250 - R500 (1)
  • -
Status
Brand

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 matches in All Departments

Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback): Wing Commander Raaf,... Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback)
Wing Commander Raaf, Anthony Forestier, Lieutenant Colonel Usaf, David Miller; Contributions by Air Univers Press
R403 Discovery Miles 4 030 Ships in 18 - 22 working days

One of the challenges Gen. John P. Jumper, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, sends to Air Force students, researchers, and staff offices is to investigate future concepts of operations (CONOPS). One in particular relates to this study, the CONOPS for space and command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. The Air Force is very sensitive about incorporating new technology into its operations. While the authors advocate a feasibility study for reactor sin space in a CONOPS, they also explore a deeper problem with widespread theoretical employment of nuclear technology in space. They point first to the mission enabling advantages of nuclear reactors in space - factors like light weight, high power, long life, and potentially lower costs. A reactor would supply electrical power to a space vehicle and perhaps provide ionic or electrical propulsion. They see that nuclear-powered spacecraft would serve long-range National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) missions as well as permit effective hyperspectral satellites that would have profound benefits for the Department of Defense. The limiting factors for nuclear power in space are a compelling mission requirement and broad acceptance in popular support. The first factor is rather obvious but the second is driven by a broad-based fear of risks in the employment of nuclear technology. Many have general doubts about such an undertaking. Some opponents perceive cataclysmic dangers. A failure of space launch carrying nuclear systems would produce something on the order of a "dirty" nuclear bomb. Opponents are rigorous in their protest. Two things were clear to these researchers. One, nuclear space developers must convince the public that they are capable of developing a safe and robust system. Two, because the political battle is primarily over perceived risks rather than empirically based understanding, employment of value-focused decision strategy is necessary to convince the public and congressional leaders of the feasibility of a space nuclear program.

Free Delivery
Pinterest Twitter Facebook Google+
You may like...
Occupational Health and Safety…
Charles D Reese Paperback R1,645 R1,524 Discovery Miles 15 240
Principles of Digital Signal Processing…
S. Palani Hardcover R2,789 Discovery Miles 27 890
A Textbook of General Practice 3E
Anne Stephenson Paperback R1,313 Discovery Miles 13 130
Fine Living Athens Side Table (Wood)
R1,999 R1,403 Discovery Miles 14 030
Gods, Goddesses, And Images of God
Othmar Keel Hardcover R4,968 Discovery Miles 49 680
The Impact of Negro Voting - The Role of…
William Keech Hardcover R2,032 Discovery Miles 20 320
Work and Sleep - Research Insights for…
Julian Barling, Christopher M. Barnes, … Hardcover R2,573 Discovery Miles 25 730
Handbook of Pediatric Brain Imaging…
Hao Huang, Timothy Roberts Paperback R3,531 Discovery Miles 35 310
South African Employment Relations…
P.S. Nel, Monica Kirsten, … Paperback  (1)
R803 Discovery Miles 8 030
Machine Learning for Computer Vision
Roberto Cipolla, Sebastiano Battiato, … Hardcover R2,675 Discovery Miles 26 750

 

Partners