0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Browse All Departments
  • All Departments
Price
  • R250 - R500 (1)
  • -
Status
Brand

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 matches in All Departments

Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback): Wing Commander Raaf,... Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback)
Wing Commander Raaf, Anthony Forestier, Lieutenant Colonel Usaf, David Miller; Contributions by Air Univers Press
R393 Discovery Miles 3 930 Ships in 10 - 15 working days

One of the challenges Gen. John P. Jumper, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, sends to Air Force students, researchers, and staff offices is to investigate future concepts of operations (CONOPS). One in particular relates to this study, the CONOPS for space and command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. The Air Force is very sensitive about incorporating new technology into its operations. While the authors advocate a feasibility study for reactor sin space in a CONOPS, they also explore a deeper problem with widespread theoretical employment of nuclear technology in space. They point first to the mission enabling advantages of nuclear reactors in space - factors like light weight, high power, long life, and potentially lower costs. A reactor would supply electrical power to a space vehicle and perhaps provide ionic or electrical propulsion. They see that nuclear-powered spacecraft would serve long-range National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) missions as well as permit effective hyperspectral satellites that would have profound benefits for the Department of Defense. The limiting factors for nuclear power in space are a compelling mission requirement and broad acceptance in popular support. The first factor is rather obvious but the second is driven by a broad-based fear of risks in the employment of nuclear technology. Many have general doubts about such an undertaking. Some opponents perceive cataclysmic dangers. A failure of space launch carrying nuclear systems would produce something on the order of a "dirty" nuclear bomb. Opponents are rigorous in their protest. Two things were clear to these researchers. One, nuclear space developers must convince the public that they are capable of developing a safe and robust system. Two, because the political battle is primarily over perceived risks rather than empirically based understanding, employment of value-focused decision strategy is necessary to convince the public and congressional leaders of the feasibility of a space nuclear program.

Free Delivery
Pinterest Twitter Facebook Google+
You may like...
491 Days - Prisoner Number 1323/69
Winnie Madikizela-Mandela Paperback  (2)
R250 R195 Discovery Miles 1 950
The Education of Will - Healing a Dog…
Patricia B McConnell Paperback R461 R385 Discovery Miles 3 850
Ougat - From A Hoe Into A Housewife, And…
Shana Fife Paperback  (5)
R275 R220 Discovery Miles 2 200
Khwezi - The Remarkable Story Of…
Redi Tlhabi Paperback  (7)
R637 Discovery Miles 6 370
Deference and Defiance in Monterrey…
Michael Snodgrass Hardcover R2,524 R2,096 Discovery Miles 20 960
The Arab Spring, Civil Society, and…
Cenap Cakmak Hardcover R3,928 Discovery Miles 39 280
I Have Life - Alison's Journey
Marianne Thamm Paperback R290 R227 Discovery Miles 2 270
Crossroads - I Live Where I Like
Koni Benson Paperback R240 R188 Discovery Miles 1 880
Miss Behave
Malebo Sephodi Paperback  (12)
R277 Discovery Miles 2 770
Normal Women - 900 Years Of Making…
Philippa Gregory Paperback R420 R332 Discovery Miles 3 320

 

Partners