0
Your cart

Your cart is empty

Browse All Departments
  • All Departments
Price
  • R250 - R500 (1)
  • -
Status
Brand

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 matches in All Departments

Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback): Wing Commander Raaf,... Flying Reactors - The Political Feasibility of Nuclear Power in Space: CADRE Paper No. 22 (Paperback)
Wing Commander Raaf, Anthony Forestier, Lieutenant Colonel Usaf, David Miller; Contributions by Air Univers Press
R424 Discovery Miles 4 240 Ships in 10 - 15 working days

One of the challenges Gen. John P. Jumper, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, sends to Air Force students, researchers, and staff offices is to investigate future concepts of operations (CONOPS). One in particular relates to this study, the CONOPS for space and command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. The Air Force is very sensitive about incorporating new technology into its operations. While the authors advocate a feasibility study for reactor sin space in a CONOPS, they also explore a deeper problem with widespread theoretical employment of nuclear technology in space. They point first to the mission enabling advantages of nuclear reactors in space - factors like light weight, high power, long life, and potentially lower costs. A reactor would supply electrical power to a space vehicle and perhaps provide ionic or electrical propulsion. They see that nuclear-powered spacecraft would serve long-range National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) missions as well as permit effective hyperspectral satellites that would have profound benefits for the Department of Defense. The limiting factors for nuclear power in space are a compelling mission requirement and broad acceptance in popular support. The first factor is rather obvious but the second is driven by a broad-based fear of risks in the employment of nuclear technology. Many have general doubts about such an undertaking. Some opponents perceive cataclysmic dangers. A failure of space launch carrying nuclear systems would produce something on the order of a "dirty" nuclear bomb. Opponents are rigorous in their protest. Two things were clear to these researchers. One, nuclear space developers must convince the public that they are capable of developing a safe and robust system. Two, because the political battle is primarily over perceived risks rather than empirically based understanding, employment of value-focused decision strategy is necessary to convince the public and congressional leaders of the feasibility of a space nuclear program.

Free Delivery
Pinterest Twitter Facebook Google+
You may like...
Loot
Nadine Gordimer Paperback  (2)
R398 R330 Discovery Miles 3 300
Aqualine Back Float (Yellow and Blue)
R277 Discovery Miles 2 770
Ergo Mouse Pad Wrist Rest Support
R399 R149 Discovery Miles 1 490
Bostik Glu Dots - Removable (64 Dots)
 (3)
R55 Discovery Miles 550
Alva 5-Piece Roll-Up BBQ/ Braai Tool Set
R550 Discovery Miles 5 500
Bestway Dolphin Armbands (23 x 15cm…
R33 R31 Discovery Miles 310
Casio LW-200-7AV Watch with 10-Year…
R999 R884 Discovery Miles 8 840
Bantex @School Modelling Clay (15g x 12…
R23 Discovery Miles 230
Aerolatte Cappuccino Art Stencils (Set…
R110 R95 Discovery Miles 950
Joseph Joseph Index Mini (Graphite)
R642 Discovery Miles 6 420

 

Partners