|
Showing 1 - 18 of
18 matches in All Departments
C. G. Jung's psychology was based on an authentic notion of soul,
but this notion was only intuitive, implicit, not conceptually
worked out. His followers forfeit his heritage, often turning
psychology either into pop psychology or into a scientific,
clinical enterprise. It is the merit of James Hillman's archetypal
psychology to have brought back the question of soul to psychology.
But as imaginal psychology it cannot truly overcome psychology's
positivistic, personalistic bias that it set out to overcome. Its
ŤGods can be shown to be virtual-reality type gods because it
avoids the question of Truth. Through what logically is the
movement of an Ťabsolute-negative interiorization, alchemically a
Ťfermenting corruption, and mythologically a Dionysian
dismemberment, one has to go beyond the imaginal to a notion of
soul as logical life, logical movement. Only then can psychology be
freed from its positivism and cease being a subdivision of
anthropology, and can the notion of soul be logically released from
its attachment to the notion of the human being.
This book is about the practice of working with dreams. Rather than
presenting a general theory about dreams, it focuses on the dream
as phenomenon and raises the question how we must look at dreams if
our approach is supposed to be a truly psychological one. So far
most essays on, and the practice of, Jungian dream interpretation
have paradoxically centered around the person of the dreamer and
not around the dream itself. Dreams were used as a means to
understand the analysand and what is going on in him or her. Jung's
fundamental shift from his earlier person-based psychology and
pre-alchemy stance to his mature soul-based psychology, informed by
the hermetic logic of alchemy, has not been followed, which was
already noted by Jung himself: "My later and more important work
(as it seems to me) is still left untouched in its primordial
obscurity." The present study is based decidedly on the stance of
mature Jung and his very different views about dreams. His most
crucial insights in this regard include that in dreams the soul
speaks about itself (not about the dreamer), that the dream is its
own interpretation and therefore needs to be circumambulated
(rather than translated into the language of psychology and
everyday life), and that dream images have everything they need
within themselves (rather than needing associations from the
dreamer's daily life). This book discusses in detail what all this
means in practice and what it demands of the psychologist. A
decisive transposition away from ordinary consciousness, a
"crossing to the other side of the river," is required of the
consciousness that wants to approach dreams psychologically.
Numerous aspects of dreams and special questions that come up in
working with dreams are discussed. At the end of this book our
working with dreams is situated in the wider question of the
psychological task in general by exploring Jung's insistence that
psychology has to transcend the "consulting room," Hillman's move
"From mirror to window" and, in Plato's parable, the revolutionary
move out of, and return to, "the cave." While limited to the topic
of dreams this book may also serve as an indirect introduction to
an understanding of psychology as a "psychology with soul" (Jung)
or as the discipline of interiority.
This first volume of The Collected English Papers of Wolfgang
Giegerich takes its title from Giegerich's ground-breaking paper,
On the Neurosis of Psychology, or The Third of the Two, originally
published in Spring Journal in 1977. The third referred to in the
title is psychology itself as the theory in which the two, patient
and analyst, are contained as they engage with one another in the
analytic process. By applying to psychology itself the ideas that
analytical psychology draws upon when thinking about the patient,
Giegerich establishes the basis for a psychology that defines
itself as the discipline of interiority. Topics include Neumann's
history of consciousness, Jung's thought of the self, the question
of a Jungian identity, projection, the origin of psychology, and
more.
This book is about the practice of working with dreams. Rather than
presenting a general theory about dreams, it focuses on the dream
as phenomenon and raises the question how we must look at dreams if
our approach is supposed to be a truly psychological one. So far
most essays on, and the practice of, Jungian dream interpretation
have paradoxically centered around the person of the dreamer and
not around the dream itself. Dreams were used as a means to
understand the analysand and what is going on in him or her. Jung's
fundamental shift from his earlier person-based psychology and
pre-alchemy stance to his mature soul-based psychology, informed by
the hermetic logic of alchemy, has not been followed, which was
already noted by Jung himself: "My later and more important work
(as it seems to me) is still left untouched in its primordial
obscurity." The present study is based decidedly on the stance of
mature Jung and his very different views about dreams. His most
crucial insights in this regard include that in dreams the soul
speaks about itself (not about the dreamer), that the dream is its
own interpretation and therefore needs to be circumambulated
(rather than translated into the language of psychology and
everyday life), and that dream images have everything they need
within themselves (rather than needing associations from the
dreamer's daily life). This book discusses in detail what all this
means in practice and what it demands of the psychologist. A
decisive transposition away from ordinary consciousness, a
"crossing to the other side of the river," is required of the
consciousness that wants to approach dreams psychologically.
Numerous aspects of dreams and special questions that come up in
working with dreams are discussed. At the end of this book our
working with dreams is situated in the wider question of the
psychological task in general by exploring Jung's insistence that
psychology has to transcend the "consulting room," Hillman's move
"From mirror to window" and, in Plato's parable, the revolutionary
move out of, and return to, "the cave." While limited to the topic
of dreams this book may also serve as an indirect introduction to
an understanding of psychology as a "psychology with soul" (Jung)
or as the discipline of interiority.
C. G. Jung regarded the soul to be a reality in its own right which
reflects itself in all manner of images and events. symbols and
traditions. In this fourth volume of his Collected English Papers,
Giegerich recalls the soul to the inwardness of its own home
territory by bringing out the thought-character of the
self-creating, self-unfolding logical life that it is. In addition
to clarifying what thought means for psychology and analyzing
certain misconceptions surrounding the topic of "soul and thought"
a challenging thesis concerning the limitation of an imaginal,
"anima-only" approach in psychology (given the essential
historicity of the soul) is carefully argued, while examining at
the same time such topics as "the end of meaning and the birth of
man," "anima mundi and time", "the metamorphosis of the gods," and
the logical steps involved in the transition from childhood to
adulthood and from a psychological oneness with nature to modern
alienation from nature. The book also discusses the notion of the
soul's logical life and shows in action the psychological procedure
of "absolute-negative interiorization" of phenomena into their soul
and truth in a number of in-depth examinations of particular
phenomena (e.g. Heraclitus' dictum about the soul's depth, the
"leap into the solid stone," the negativity of the "stone which is
not a stone"). In thorough-going critical engagements with other
authors in the field, it demonstrates specific instances where
psychology fails to do its job due to faulty presuppositions, above
all psychology's failure to face the modern world. It emphasizes
the active role of the mind in soul-making as the making of psychic
reality. It addresses the questions of the future of psychology and
whether progress in psychology is possible.
"All steps forward in the improvement of the human psyche have been
paid for by blood." Further to this statement from C. G. Jung,
Wolfgang Giegerich's third volume of Collected English Papers shows
that the soul is not merely the innocent recipient or victim of
violence: it also produces itself through violent deeds and
expresses itself through violent acts. Beginning in primordial
times with the ritual spilling of blood in animal and human
sacrifice, a light was kindled within the darkness of what would
otherwise have been mere biological existence, the light of
consciousness, mindedness, and "the soul." And following upon this,
in the clearance thus created, the soul attained new statuses of
itself on the historic battlefields of war and revolution.
First-order killings gave way to second-order killings, the
killings of metaphysics and philosophy. Turning around upon itself
(even as it violently engaged those adversarial others through whom
its self-relation was mediated) the soul learned to self-critically
cut into itself. It was in this way, as the inwardness of the blood
that was paid out for it, that psychology emerged. Topics include
ritual slaughter as primordial soul-making, shadow integration and
the rise of psychology, blood-brotherhood and blood-revenge, the
alchemy of history, Kafka's "In the Penal Colony," child sacrifice,
Islamic terrorism, and the animus as negation with special
reference to Bluebeard.
Psychological analysis usually sets its sights upon the patient or
upon cultural phenomena such as myths, literature, or works of art.
The essays in this volume, by contrast, have another addressee,
another subject matter: psychology itself. Deeply informed by
Jung's insight regarding the discipline's lack of an objective
vantage point outside and beyond the psyche, their Jungian author
again and again turns Jung's contribution to psychology around upon
itself in the spirit of an immanent critique. Cutting to the quick,
the question is put: in its constitution as psychology is Jungian
psychology up to the level of what its insight into psychology's
lack of an Archimedean point would require? Are the interpretations
it gives of its various subject matters-alchemy, religion, the
unconscious and the rest-matched by its interpretation of itself?
Has its meeting itself in them had consequences for itself,
consequences in terms of the fathoming of its own truth? Or
clinging to the standpoint of empirical observer, did it ultimately
demur with regards to the question of their truth and its own -
this despite Jung's having characterized his work as an opus
divinum? Topics include Jung's psychology project as a response to
the condition of the world, the "smuggling" inherent in the logic
of "the unconscious," the closure and setting free dialectic of
alchemy and psychology, the blindness to logical form problematic,
the faultiness of the opposition "Individual" and "Collective",
Jung's communion fiasco, his thinking the thought of not-thinking,
the veracity of his Red Book, the disenchantment complex, and, as
indicated in the title of this volume, Jung's psychology project as
a counter-speculative "flight into the unconscious."
C. G. Jung famously declared that it is not the psyche that is in
us, but rather we who are in the psyche. Updating this insight, the
second volume of Wolfgang Giegerich's Collected English Papers
examines what must be regarded as the most all-encompassing
presence of our lives today: technological civilization. Living
within technology, we now find that what we had formerly regarded
as psychological phenomena-our feelings and emotions, images and
dreams-have been superseded by phenomena bearing the predicates
"artificial," "manufactured," and "virtual." Television, the World
Wide Web, and the nuclear bomb are cases in point. Far from being
mere things among things, each of these has transformed the whole
of man's world-relation. Though deplored by many as soulless on
this account, these phenomena, it may be argued, are the real gods,
the real archetypes, of the soul today. Psychologically it is not
what we think and feel about them that counts, but what they think,
what they feel.
The fundamental importance of Christianity for Jung is well
documented in his writings and letters. For the whole of his long
career the great psychologist had wrestled with what he called "
... the great snake of the centuries. the burden of the human mind.
the problem of Christianity." By comparison, his statements about
Hegel are quite scarce. Both topics, nevertheless, have in common
that they elicited from Jung radical accusations, accusations not
presented in the calm tone of a psychological scholar but fired by
a deep-seated personal affect that propelled Jung to wish "to dream
the myth onwards," that is, to move to a new, his own improved and
corrected version of Christianity. Rather than merely portraying
and elucidating Jung's views, this volume critically examines his
theses and arguments by means of a series of close readings and by
confronting his claims with the texts on which his interpretations
are based. The guiding principle, in the spirit of which the
author's investigation is conducted, is the question of the needs
of the soul and the standards of true psychology. While constantly
bearing these needs and standards in mind, diverse topics are
discussed in depth: Jung's interpretation of a dream he had had
about being unable to completely bow down before "the highest
presence," his thesis concerning the patriarchal neglect of the
feminine principle, his views about the alleged one-sidedness of
Christianity, the "recalcitrant Fourth" and the "reality of Evil,"
his understanding of the Trinity and the spirit, his rejection of
Hegel and of speculative thought, and his reaction to the modern
"doubt that has killed" religious faith. A companion to the
preceding volume, The Flight into the Unconscious, the essays
collected here continue its radical critique of Jung's psychology
project, yielding not only deep insights into Jung's personal
religiosity and into what ultimately drove his psychology project
as a whole, but granting as well a more sophisticated understanding
of the psychological potential and telos of the Christian idea.
Serves as the most accessible introduction to Giegerich's approach
to psychology for the first-time reader of his work. Presented in a
unique conversational style.
C. G. Jung famously declared that it is not the psyche that is in
us, but rather we who are in the psyche. Updating this insight, the
second volume of Wolfgang Giegerich's Collected English Papers
examines what must be regarded as the most all-encompassing
presence of our lives today: technological civilization. Living
within technology, we now find that what we had formerly regarded
as psychological phenomena-our feelings and emotions, images and
dreams-have been superseded by phenomena bearing the predicates
"artificial," "manufactured," and "virtual." Television, the World
Wide Web, and the nuclear bomb are cases in point. Far from being
mere things among things, each of these has transformed the whole
of man's world-relation. Though deplored by many as soulless on
this account, these phenomena, it may be argued, are the real gods,
the real archetypes, of the soul today. Psychologically it is not
what we think and feel about them that counts, but what they think,
what they feel.
C. G. Jung's psychology was based on an authentic notion of soul,
but this notion was only intuitive, implicit, not conceptually
worked out. His followers forfeit his heritage, often turning
psychology either into pop psychology or into a scientific,
clinical enterprise. It is the merit of James Hillman's archetypal
psychology to have brought back the question of soul to psychology.
But as imaginal psychology it cannot truly overcome psychology's
positivistic, personalistic bias that it set out to overcome. Its
"Gods" can be shown to be virtual-reality type gods because it
avoids the question of Truth. Through what logically is the
movement of an "absolute-negative interiorization", alchemically a
"fermenting corruption", and mythologically a Dionysian
dismemberment, one has to go beyond the imaginal to a notion of
soul as logical life, logical movement. Only then can psychology be
freed from its positivism and cease being a subdivision of
anthropology, and can the notion of soul be logically released from
its attachment to the notion of the human being.
Accessible introduction to Giegerich's work. Takes up the Jungian
commitment to a psychology with soul. Combines philosophy and
analytical psychology in assessing the concept of 'soul'.
Giegerich's most clinically relevant work. Interdisciplinary,
covering intersection of analytical psychology, the history of
psychoanalysis and philosophy.
Serves as the most accessible introduction to Giegerich's approach
to psychology for the first-time reader of his work. Presented in a
unique conversational style.
|
You may like...
Hampstead
Diane Keaton, Brendan Gleeson, …
DVD
R63
Discovery Miles 630
|