The problem of justifying legal punishment has been at the heart
of legal and social philosophy from the very earliest recorded
philosophical texts. However, despite several hundred years of
debate, philosophers have not reached agreement about how legal
punishment can be morally justified. That is the central issue
addressed by the contributors to this volume. All of the essays
collected here have been published in the highly respected journal
"Philosophy & Public Affairs." Taken together, they offer not
only significant proposals for improving established theories of
punishment and compelling arguments against long-held positions,
but also ori-ginal and important answers to the question, "How is
punishment to be justified?"
Part I of this collection, "Justifications of Punishment,"
examines how any practice of punishment can be morally justified.
Contributors include Jeffrie G. Murphy, Alan H. Goldman, Warren
Quinn, C. S. Nino, and Jean Hampton. The papers in Part II,
"Problems of Punishment," address more specific issues arising in
established theories. The authors are Martha C. Nussbaum, Michael
Davis, and A. John Simmons. In the final section, "Capital
Punishment," contributors discuss the justifiability of capital
punishment, one of the most debated philosophical topics of this
century. Essayists include David A. Conway, Jeffrey H. Reiman,
Stephen Nathanson, and Ernest van den Haag.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!