2007 Ruth Shonle Cavan Young Scholar Award presented by the
American Society of Criminology
2007 American Society of Criminology Michael J. Hindelang Award
for the Most Outstanding Contribution to Research in
Criminology
By comparing how adolescents are prosecuted and punished in
juvenile and criminal (adult) courts, Aaron Kupchik finds that
prosecuting adolescents in criminal court does not fit with our
cultural understandings of youthfulness. As a result, adolescents
who are transferred to criminal courts are still judged as
juveniles. Ultimately, Kupchik makes a compelling argument for the
suitability of juvenile courts in treating adolescents. Judging
Juveniles suggests that justice would be better served if
adolescents were handled by the system designed to address their
special needs.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!