This volume is a thematic study in legal history that uses past
and present landmark court cases to analyze the legal and
historical development of moral regulatory policies in America and
resulting debates. Using a critical variable approach, the book
demonstrates how different elements of the legal process have
historically influenced the litigation of various moral issues.
Five moral policies are included: abortion, sodomy, pornography,
criminal insanity, and the death penalty. The book's framework for
analysis uses examples from English legal history and links them to
American cases, demonstrating how moral regulatory policies are
impacted by the legal process: by laws, by judges and juries, by
legal scholars, and by attorneys.
Following a brief introduction, Chapter 1 examines how
protagonists in the bitter moral and legal controversy over
abortion in America have sought to fortify their positions with the
views of prominent English legal authorities. The authors discuss
the role of English legal scholars in court opinion and oral
arguments in Webster and in Roe v. Wade, and debates Roe's
interpretation of the English legalists. Chapter 2 describes how
attempts to expand a right of privacy under the federal
Constitution to include sodomy failed the test for common law
rights (Rights of Englishmen) in Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), and
includes a history of sodomy in early English and American law.
Chapter 3 discusses pornography standards and laws, highlighting
the history of legal actions taken against Memoirs of a Woman of
Pleasure in both England and the U.S., demonstrating the role of
precedent in American judicial efforts to define pornography. In
Chapter 4, which deals with the criminal insanity defense, the
influential role of the defense attorney on case outcomes is
illustrated in cases such as England's McNaughton case (1843) and
America's Hinckley case (1982). Chapter 5 deals with cruel and
unusual punishment throughout U.S. and English history. The book
ends with an epilogue which ties together the idea of the American
legal process as an inherited English process, reiterating how
decisionmakers continually mine the past to find traditions and
sources of moral values for justifying or criticizing current laws
and policies.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!