This study analyzes the reasoning process through which
individuals determine what consequences are appropriate for those
who do wrong. The authors presented six cases of wrongdoing to a
large number of teenagers and young adults. This sample was asked
what consequences would be appropriate for the wrongdoers and why
those proposed consequences would be appropriate. On the basis of
the data obtained from the participants, the authors constructed a
taxonomy to use in categorizing features of moral reasoning. The
authors then applied the taxonomy to compare group and individual
modes of moral decision making. The study is significant in its
reliance on original data and on its analysis of the thought
processes involved in moral decision making.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!