Many political theorists today deny that citizenship can be
defended on liberal grounds alone. Cosmopolitans claim that loyalty
to a particular state is incompatible with universal liberal
principles, which hold that we have equal duties of justice to
persons everywhere, while nationalist theorists justify civic
obligations only by reaching beyond liberal principles and invoking
the importance of national culture. In "Liberal Loyalty," Anna
Stilz challenges both views by defending a distinctively liberal
understanding of citizenship.
Drawing on Kant, Rousseau, and Habermas, Stilz argues that we
owe civic obligations to the state if it is sufficiently just, and
that constitutionally enshrined principles of justice in
themselves--rather than territory, common language, or shared
culture--are grounds for obedience to our particular state and for
democratic solidarity with our fellow citizens. She demonstrates
that specifying what freedom and equality mean among a particular
people requires their democratic participation together as a group.
Justice, therefore, depends on the authority of the democratic
state because there is no way equal freedom can be defined or
guaranteed without it. Yet, as Stilz shows, this does not mean that
each of us should entertain some vague loyalty to democracy in
general. Citizens are politically obligated to their own state and
to each other, because within their particular democracy they
define and ultimately guarantee their own civil rights.
"Liberal Loyalty" is a persuasive defense of citizenship on
purely liberal grounds.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!