Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Central government > Central government policies
|
Buy Now
The Path of American Public Policy - Comparative Perspectives (Hardcover, New)
Loot Price: R3,704
Discovery Miles 37 040
|
|
The Path of American Public Policy - Comparative Perspectives (Hardcover, New)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Among all the worlds' democracies, the American system of
government is perhaps the most self-conscious about preventing
majority tyranny. The American constitutional system is predicated
on an inherent ideational and institutional tension dating back to
the foundation of the nation in the eighteenth century, which
constrains innovative policy development. Namely, the framers
designed a system that simultaneously seeks to protect the rights
of the minority out of power and provide for majority rule. These
opposing goals are based on the idea that limiting governmental
power will guarantee individual liberty. The Path of American
Public Policy: Comparative Perspectives asks how this foundational
tension might limit the range of options available to American
policy makers. What does the resistance to change in Washington
teach us about the American system of checks and balances? Why is
it so difficult (though not impossible) to make sweeping policy
changes in the United States? How could things be different? What
would be the implications for policy formation if the United States
adopted a British-style parliamentary system? To examine these
questions, this book gives an example of when comprehensive change
failed (the 1994 Contract with America) and when it succeeded (the
2010 Affordable Care Act). A comparison of the two cases sheds
light on how and why Obama's health care was shepherded to law
under Nancy Pelosi, while Newt Gingrich was less successful with
the Contract with America. The contrast between the two cases
highlights the balance between majority rule and minority rights,
and how the foundational tension constrains public-policy
formation. While 2010 illustrates an exception to the rule about
comprehensive policy change in the United States, the 1994 is an
apt example of how our system of checks and balances usually works
to stymie expansive, far-reaching legislative initiatives.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.