While much has been written on Supreme Court appointments, Deciding
to Leave provides the first systematic look at the process by which
justices decide to retire from the bench, and why this has become
increasingly partisan in recent years. Since 1954, generous
retirement provisions and decreasing workloads have allowed
justices to depart strategically when a president of their own
party occupies the White House. Otherwise, the justices remain in
their seats, often past their ability to effectively participate in
the work of the Court. While there are benefits and drawbacks to
various reform proposals, Ward argues that mandatory retirement
goes farthest in combating partisanship and protecting the
institution of the Court.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!