This book intervenes in contemporary debates about the threat
posed to democratic life by political emergencies. Must emergency
necessarily enhance and centralize top-down forms of sovereignty?
Those who oppose executive branch enhancement often turn instead to
law, insisting on the sovereignty of the rule of law or demanding
that law rather than force be used to resolve conflicts with
enemies. But are these the only options? Or are there more
democratic ways to respond to invocations of emergency politics?
Looking at how emergencies in the past and present have shaped the
development of democracy, Bonnie Honig argues that democracies must
resist emergency's pull to focus on life's necessities (food,
security, and bare essentials) because these tend to privatize and
isolate citizens rather than bring us together on behalf of hopeful
futures. Emphasizing the connections between mere life and more
life, emergence and emergency, Honig argues that emergencies call
us to attend anew to a neglected paradox of democratic politics:
that we need good citizens with aspirational ideals to make good
politics while we need good politics to infuse citizens with
idealism.
Honig takes a broad approach to emergency, considering
immigration politics, new rights claims, contemporary food politics
and the infrastructure of consumption, and the limits of law during
the Red Scare of the early twentieth century. Taking its bearings
from Moses Mendelssohn, Franz Rosenzweig, and other Jewish
thinkers, this is a major contribution to modern thought about the
challenges and risks of democratic orientation and action in
response to emergency.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!