The increasing reliance on private security services raises
questions about the effects of privatization on the quality of
public police forces, particularly in high-crime, low-income areas.
In an effective pro-and-con format, two experts on policing offer
two strikingly different perspectives on this trend towards
privatization. In the process, they provide an unusually thoughtful
discussion of the origins of both the public police and the private
security sectors, the forces behind the recent growth of private
security operations, and the risks to public safety posed by
privatization.
In his critique of privatization, Peter K. Manning focuses on
issues of free market theory and management practices such as Total
Quality Management that he believes are harmful to the traditional
police mandate to control crime. He questions the appropriateness
of strategies that emphasize service to consumers. For Brian Forst,
the free market paradigm and economic incentives do not carry the
same stigma. He argues that neither public nor private policing
should have a monopoly on law enforcement activities, and he
predicts an even more varied mix of public and private police
activities than are currently available.
Following the two main sections of the book, each author
assesses the other's contribution, reflecting on not just their
points of departure but also on the areas in which they agree. The
breadth and depth of the discussion makes this book essential for
both scholars and practitioners interested in policing generally
and privatization in particular.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!