In the past four decades, the United States has spent $85
billion pursuing the fantasy of an effective missile defense system
to shield our nation against the threat of a nuclear attack. Recent
public tests, while less exotic than some of the original Star Wars
proposals, were spectacular failures and call into question the
whole prograM's rationale. Neither the land-based system proposed
by the Clinton administration, nor the alternatives proposed by
earlier administrations, would ever work--regardless of how much
R&D money is channeled into the project. Rather than enhancing
national security, these doomed efforts would provoke a new arms
race and alienate key allies. The authors apply their extensive
insiders' expertise to argue that thoughtful diplomacy is the only
real answer to meet America's national security goals.
Like President Reagan with his Star Wars program, President Bush
has again made national missile defense (NMD) a national priority
at a cost which may exceed $150 billion in the next ten years.
Defense experts Eisendrath, Goodman, and Marsh contend that recent
tests give little confidence that any of the systems under
consideration--land-based, boost-phase, or laser-driven--have any
chance of effective deployment within decades. The interests of the
military-industrial complex and the unilateralist views of the Bush
administration are driving NMD, not a desire to promote national
security.
Rather than increase U.S. security, the plans of the current
administration, if implemented, will erode it. NMD will heighten
the threat from China and Russia, alienate key allies, and provoke
a new arms race and the proliferation of nuclear weapons, all in
response to a greatly exaggerated threat from so-called rogue
states, such as North Korea and Iran. Thoughtful diplomacy, not a
misguided foreign policy based on a hopeless dream of a Fortress
America, is the real answer to meeting Americas security goals.
Designed to stimulate interest and debate among the public and
policy-makers, "The Phantom Defense" provides solid facts and
combines scientific, geopolitical, historical, and strategic
analysis to critique the delusion of national missile defense,
while suggesting a more effective alternative.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!