A fresh and provocative perspective on the judicial process and
the transmission of ideas into law. Professors McIntosh and Cates
demonstrate, through the actions and writings of such diverse
jurists as Louis Brandeis, Sandra Day O'Connor, Jerome Frank, and
Hans Linde, how judges' pet intellectual projects become the fodder
for new ideas in the law.
Through a series of case studies, Professors McIntosh and Cates
argue for the assessment of judicial activity from a fresh
perspective. They focus on the appellate system and those judges
who help to move the law-i.e., entrepreneurs. Appeals court judges
are in a unique position in that they are presented with real
opportunities to influence the shape and meaning of law.
Jurists have special interests, some areas of the law that
particularly attract them. When questions arise in these fields,
jurists are likely to seize the moment, allowing them to express
their expertise and be creative. This is not only a natural course
for highly motivated individuals, but also a mode of operation that
is important to the development of our law. Through an examination
of the actions and writings of such diverse jurists as Louis
Brandeis, Sandra Day O'Connor, Jerome Frank, and Hans Linde, the
authors explore this concept of entrepreneurship, in which judges
take on and promote their pet projects. Of great interest to
scholars and researchers in political science and law, and those
concerned with judicial process and behavior, and court
policymaking.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!