Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Public administration
|
Buy Now
Scope and Theory of Public Administration - The Shaping Influences of Interdisciplinary Discourse (Hardcover)
Loot Price: R2,581
Discovery Miles 25 810
|
|
Scope and Theory of Public Administration - The Shaping Influences of Interdisciplinary Discourse (Hardcover)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
The scope and theory of American public administration have
expanded outward over time through the process of interdisciplinary
discourse. Interdisciplinary approaches are rooted in ancient
times, but it is in modern applications that the process has become
most noticeable as a substantive influence in how academic
disciplines and professional practices evolve. The process of
interdisciplinary discourse occurs first by decoding and
interpreting basic language and concepts, and then progresses to an
operationalization of ideas, consensus-building, synthesis and
integration, and eventually the systematization of knowledge. It is
from the systematization of knowledge that a discipline's
foundations are forged and evolve. Government is as old as society,
but American public administration emerged as a structured field
largely toward the late nineteenth-century, developing over the
course of 125 years through the exchange of interdisciplinary
ideas. The current literature on interdisciplinary approaches
focuses almost exclusively upon basic teaching and research
applications. This book extends the topic significantly by
developing a formal process by which basic, intermediate, and
advanced levels of communication are analyzed and understood. The
value of this approach rests in being able to explore public
administration history and contemporary times through the assorted
contexts and ideas which affected the lower order core constructs
(concepts, values, and principles) and higher order associational
constructs (methodologies, theories, and foundations) that have
been forged. As the field's scope and theory expanded over time
through the exchange of interdisciplinary content, lower levels of
consensus from within caused segments of academicians to argue that
an intellectual crisis had occurred, reflecting the lack of a
unifying theory or paradigm. Debate over what role traditional
modes of inquiry and thought would have in a contemporary era of
scientific techniques naturally propelled the field into a
normative-science debate. This, along with the rise of competing
theories, advancements in technology, and an emphasis on
establishing public administration as a relevant field with
professional stature, led to two subsequent recastings during which
the field has modernized and updated itself gradually over the
course of several years. A third recasting may be on the horizon,
carrying forward the many shaping influences of interdisciplinary
discourse.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.