Many modern conservatives and feminists trace the roots of their
ideologies, respectively, to Edmund Burke (1729-1797) and Mary
Wollstonecraft (1759-1797), and a proper understanding of these two
thinkers is therefore important as a framework for political
debates today.
According to Daniel O'Neill, Burke is misconstrued if viewed as
mainly providing a warning about the dangers of attempting to turn
utopian visions into political reality, while Wollstonecraft is far
more than just a proponent of extending the public sphere rights of
man to include women. Rather, at the heart of their differences
lies a dispute over democracy as a force tending toward savagery
(Burke) or toward civilization (Wollstonecraft). Their debate over
the meaning of the French Revolution is the place where these
differences are elucidated, but the real key to understanding what
this debate is about is its relation to the intellectual tradition
of the Scottish Enlightenment, whose language of politics provided
the discursive framework within and against which Burke and
Wollstonecraft developed their own unique ideas about what was
involved in the civilizing process.
General
Imprint: |
Pennsylvania State University Press
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Release date: |
July 2007 |
First published: |
July 2007 |
Authors: |
Daniel I. O’Neill
|
Dimensions: |
229 x 152 x 18mm (L x W x T) |
Format: |
Hardcover
|
Pages: |
304 |
ISBN-13: |
978-0-271-03201-6 |
Categories: |
Books
Promotions
|
LSN: |
0-271-03201-4 |
Barcode: |
9780271032016 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!