This essay will begin where we, humankind, have lead ourselves as
we attempted to slash our way through the jungle of life's
seemingly endless paradoxes. These paradoxes, which life has
persistently thrown across our path, are signposts for us. They are
indicators that we do not have all the answers. They warn us to
beware. They warn us there is something wrong with our perception
of life; there is something wrong with our thinking. They have a
function of their own, they direct us towards a state of
understanding where we are, what we are, and why it is we exist. In
this essay, we will be attempting to understand the likes of
Russell, Wittgenstein, Frege, Plotinus, and back again to Russell
as we attempt to move past parts of Heidegger. Our objective will
be to step back in time in order to get back to today. What is the
point of going to all this trouble just to get back to where we
started? The point is to bring back with us a new perception
regarding a simpler solution to Russell's paradox. Why is this
important? Presently we have a solution to Russell's paradox, which
involves a complex understanding of 'separation through
exclusionism', which in turn represents what we do to people in
society. We separate individuals and groups from our own groups and
ourselves. Once having separated them from ourselves we exclude
them from ourselves through a process of rejection, exclusionism,
and separation. It is Russell's paradox, which provides the key to
rectifying these constant actions of rejection. For this reason we
will accompany Russell as he travels eighteen hundred years back in
time. This trip will allow us to bring back with us a different
solution to Russell's paradox. This trip will allow us to bring
back a process known as 'separation through inclusion'. Now the
name would seem to imply our creating a paradox to act as a
solution to Russell's paradox but as we shall see it does nothing
of the kind. What it does is allow us to find a much simpler
solution to Russell's paradox. 'But what does this concept of
'separation through exclusion' as opposed to 'separation through
inclusion' have to do with me?' you may ask. The process provides
an alternative means to resolving a fundamental paradox of
mathematics, which in turn can be applied directly to the process
of understanding life. It is the simplistic resolution of complex
paradoxes, which provides us with a simplistic understanding of
life. It is through this process that we shall see 'Ockham's razor
not only cuts away the complexity of science but becomes the
primary tool for Husserl's bracketing . Ockham's Razor now becomes
not only a principle axiom for science but now moves on to become a
principle axiom of philosophy. This is an essay beginning in
complexity and ending in simplicity. Why is it that we must begin
in complexity rather than begin at the logical point of origin, the
point of simplicity? We begin in complexity for it is through
complexity that we presently have begun to understand Russell's
paradox . Presently we have solved Russell's paradox in a complex
fashion. This has led us to understanding life in a complex manner.
We cannot understand the simplicity of life as long as the basics
remain complex. The solution to this problem lies in the
understanding of Russell's paradox. Once you understand the end of
this essay, you will begin to understand why it is that we must go
back and make a correctional adjustment to our journey as
individuals and as specie. The question becomes, 'How far back in
time must we travel to do all this?' We must go back 1700 years.
Who will lead us on this backtracking expedition? The honors will
go to Bertrand Russell himself. Russell verbalized the paradox in
1901. As such, it is Russell's paradox. Therefore, it will be
Russell who will lead our backtracking expedition, which will lead
us to an understanding of life.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!