In this study, Daniel W. Graham addresses two major problems in
interpreting Aristotle. First, should we reconcile the apparent
inconsistencies of the corpus by assuming an underlying unity of
doctrine (unitarianism), or by positing a sequence of developing
ideas (developmentalism)? Secondly, what is the relation between
the so-called logical works on the one hand and the
physical-metaphysical treatises on the other? Although the problems
appear to be unrelated, Graham finds that the key to the first lies
in the second, and in doing so provides the first major alternative
to the unitarian approach since Jaeger's pioneering developmental
study of 1923.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!