For most bills in American legislature, the issue of turf - or
which committee has jurisdiction over a bill - is crucial. This
study explains how jurisdictional areas for committees are created
and changed in Congress, and dissects the politics of
"turf-grabbing". Political scientists have long maintained that
jurisdictions are relatively static, changing only at times of
dramatic reforms. David King disagrees with this premise and,
combining quantitative evidence with interviews and case studies,
he shows how ongoing turf wars make jurisdictions fluid. He argues
that jurisdictional change stems both from legislators seeking
electoral advantage and from nonpartisan House parliamentarians
referring ambiguous bills to committees with the expertise to
handle the issues. King shows how parliamentarians have become
institutional guardians of the legislative process.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!