This study seeks to demonstrate the subtle ways in which changes in
the language associated with economic issues are reflective of a
gradual but quantifiable conservative ideological shift. In this
rigorous analysis, David George uses as his data a century of word
usage within The New York Times, starting in 1900. It is not always
obvious how the changes identified necessarily reflect a stronger
prejudice toward laissez-faire free market capitalism, and so much
of the book seeks to demonstrate the subtle ways in which the
changing language indeed carries with it a political message. This
analysis is made through exploration of five major areas of focus:
"economics rhetoric" scholarship and the growing "behavioral
economics" school of thought; the discourse of government and
taxation; the changing meaning of "competition," and "competitive";
changing attitudes toward labor; and the celebration of growth
relative to the decline in attention to economic justice and social
equality.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!