The Academic Revolution describes the rise to power of
professional scholars and scientists, first in America's leading
universities and now in the larger society as well. Without
attempting a full-scale history of American higher education, it
outlines a theory about its development and present status. It is
illustrated with firsthand observations of a wide variety of
colleges and universities the country over-colleges for the rich
and colleges for the upwardly mobile; colleges for vocationally
oriented men and colleges for intellectually and socially oriented
women; colleges for Catholics and colleges for Protestants;
colleges for blacks and colleges for rebellious whites.
The authors also look at some of the revolution's consequences.
They see it as intensifying conflict between young and old, and
provoking young people raised in permissive, middle-class homes to
attacks on the legitimacy of adult authority. In the process, the
revolution subtly transformed the kinds of work to which talented
young people aspire, contributing to the decline of
entrepreneurship and the rise of professionalism. They conclude
that mass higher education, for all its advantages, has had no
measurable effect on the rate of social mobility or the degree of
equality in American society.
Jencks and Riesman are not nostalgic; their description of the
nineteenth-century liberal arts colleges is corrosively critical.
They maintain that American students know more than ever before,
that their teachers are more competent and stimulating than in
earlier times, and that the American system of higher education has
brought the American people to an unprecedented level of academic
competence. But while they regard the academic revolution as having
been an historically necessary and progressive step, they argue
that, like all revolutions, it can devour its children. For Jencks
and Riesman, academic professionalism is an advance over amateur
gentility, but they warn of its dangers and limitations: the
elitism and arrogance implicit in meritocracy, the myopia that
derives from a strictly academic view of human experience and
understanding, the complacency that comes from making technical
competence an end rather than a means.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!