Conventional wisdom warns that unaccountable political and
business agents can enrich a few at the expense of many. But
logically extending this wisdom implies that associated principals
- voters, consumers, shareholders - will favor themselves over the
greater good when 'rules of the game' instead create too much
accountability. Democratic Governance and Economic Performance
rigorously develops this hypothesis, and finds statistical evidence
and case study illustrations that democratic institutions at
various governance levels (e.g., federal, state, corporation) have
facilitated opportunistic gains for electoral, consumer, and
shareholder principals. To be sure, this conclusion does not
dismiss the potential for democratic governance to productively
reduce agency costs. Rather, it suggests that policy makers,
lawyers, and managers can improve governance by weighing the agency
benefits of increased accountability against the distributional
costs of favoring principal stakeholders over more general economic
opportunities. Carefully considering the fundamentals that give
rise to this tradeoff should interest students and scholars working
at the intersection of social science and the law, and can help
professionals improve their own performance in policy, legal, and
business settings.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!