The topic of this book is to scholars what Uranus was to Scientists
before 1781. The ignorance of astrologers about the existence of
Uranus before 1781 does not negate the factuality of its being.
This is similar in the case of the Servant of God in John. His
predicates are there, although the title is missing. Scholars and
epochs have witnessed researches and contributions in the Gospel of
John. Many see aspects of the Servant of God in John. But just as
Uranus could not be seen but its existence was proven because of
its effects on the orbits of the other planets, so the Servant of
God of the Fourth Gospel could not be seen as a title but its
effects on the other christological titles of the gospel indicate
its reality in the gospel. The author's approach is purely
exegetico-theological.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!