A leading expert in informal logic, Douglas Walton turns his
attention in this new book to how reasoning operates in trials and
other legal contexts, with special emphasis on the law of evidence.
The new model he develops, drawing on methods of argumentation
theory that are gaining wide acceptance in computing fields like
artificial intelligence, can be used to identify, analyze, and
evaluate specific types of legal argument. In contrast with
approaches that rely on deductive and inductive logic and rule out
many common types of argument as fallacious, Walton's aim is to
provide a more expansive view of what can be considered
"reasonable" in legal argument when it is construed as a dynamic,
rule-governed, and goal-directed conversation. This dialogical
model gives new meaning to the key notions of relevance and
probative weight, with the latter analyzed in terms of pragmatic
criteria for what constitutes plausible evidence rather than
truth.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!