Starting in 1991, a consortium of criminologists, social
psychologists, and law school professors began researching how
jurors in capital cases come to their decisions. This body of work,
called the Capital Jury Project (CJP), found several trends related
to what motivates jurors to either vote for life or death; how
jurors interact with one another and what dynamics influence their
social relationships; whether jurors understand the law; and
whether jurors accept responsibility for their decisions. No such
research has been conducted on military panel members. Can military
justice practitioners look to the CJP to guide them in framing
issues for the panel members? Is there any historical evidence that
panel members in capital cases follow the same trends identified by
the CJP? How should military practitioners interpret and apply the
military-specific procedural rules in light of the CJP findings?
This thesis surveys the CJP findings, indentifies examples of the
CJP findings in military cases, and then argues that military
justice practioners should modify their practice to reflect what
the Capital Jury Project has revealed about juror beliefs about
aggravation and mitigation; jury dynamics; juror confusion; jury
decision making; and juror responsibility.
General
Imprint: |
Biblioscholar
|
Country of origin: |
United States |
Release date: |
October 2012 |
First published: |
October 2012 |
Authors: |
Eric R Carpenter
|
Dimensions: |
246 x 189 x 5mm (L x W x T) |
Format: |
Paperback - Trade
|
Pages: |
90 |
ISBN-13: |
978-1-249-82706-1 |
Categories: |
Books >
Social sciences >
Education >
General
Promotions
|
LSN: |
1-249-82706-X |
Barcode: |
9781249827061 |
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!