In the motley ranks of seventeenth-century print, one often
comes upon the title "True Relation." Purportedly true relations
describe monsters, miracles, disasters, crimes, trials, and
apparitions. They also convey discoveries achieved through
exploration or experiment. Contemporaries relied on such accounts
for access to information even as they distrusted them; scholars
today share both their dependency and their doubt. What we take as
evidence, Frances E. Dolan argues, often raises more questions than
it answers. Although historians have tracked dramatic changes in
evidentiary standards and practices in the period, these changes
did not solve the problem of how to interpret true relations or
ease the reliance on them. The burden remains on readers.Dolan
connects early modern debates about textual evidence to recent
discussions of the value of seventeenth-century texts as historical
evidence. Then as now, she contends, literary techniques of
analysis have proven central to staking and assessing truth claims.
She addresses the kinds of texts that circulated about three
traumatic events--the Gunpowder Plot, witchcraft prosecutions, and
the London Fire--and looks at legal depositions, advice literature,
and plays as genres of evidence that hover in a space between fact
and fiction. Even as doubts linger about their documentary and
literary value, scholars rely heavily on them. Confronting and
exploring these doubts, Dolan makes a case for owning up to our
agency in crafting true relations among the textual fragments that
survive.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!