In a critique of Heidegger that respects his path of thinking,
Francisco Gonzalez looks at the ways in which Heidegger engaged
with Plato's thought over the course of his career and concludes
that, owing to intrinsic requirements of Heidegger's own
philosophy, he missed an opportunity to conduct a real dialogue
with Plato that would have been philosophically fruitful for us
all.
Examining in detail early texts of Heidegger's reading of Plato
that have only recently come to light, Gonzalez, in parts 1 and 2,
shows there to be certain affinities between Heidegger's and
Plato's thought that were obscured in his 1942 essay "Plato's
Doctrine of Truth," on which scholars have exclusively relied in
interpreting what Heidegger had to say about Plato. This more
nuanced reading, in turn, helps Gonzalez provide in part 3 an
account of Heidegger's later writings that highlights the ways in
which Heidegger, in repudiating the kind of metaphysics he
associated with Plato, took a direction away from dialectic and
dialogue that left him unable to pursue those affinities that could
have enriched Heidegger's own philosophy as well as Plato's. "A
genuine dialogue with Plato," Gonzalez argues, "would have forced
Heidegger] to go in certain directions where he did not want to go
and could not go without his own thinking undergoing a radical
transformation."
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!