Peacekeeping is a useful tool to manage international conflict
and maintain truces, but it will only work in a narrow range of
circumstances. Peacekeepers can order punitive airstrikes, depose
elected leaders, destroy infrastructure, and enforce peace accords
not drafted by the warring parties. They have overstepped their
bounds, and peacekeeping is now often a euphemism for any
multilateral military action. A CIA analyst who worked closely with
Reagan, Bush, and Clinton administration officials on UN issues,
Fleitz examines how peacekeeping works, the rash of peacekeeping
failures since 1993, and whether peacekeeping can still play a role
in U.S. foreign policy. It is a unique realist assessment destined
to become the guide to this very important subject for U.S.
policymakers, politicians, and students of international
relations.
UN peacekeeping disasters in the 1990s occurred because world
leaders failed to recognize the rules and precedents that allowed
traditional peacekeeping to succeed during the Cold War. Although
failed peacekeeping operations damaged the peacekeeping concept, it
can still serve as a viable tool to promote international security
and promote American interests abroad if used in the right
circumstances. Carefully researched and supported by over two dozen
maps, charts, and photos, Fleitz boldly challenges dozens of
assumptions of the foreign policy establishment about the nature of
the Cold War, post-Cold War peacekeeping, and 1990s peacekeeping
deployments.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!