Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes > Constitution, government & the state
|
Buy Now
Constitutional Rights after Globalization (Hardcover, New)
Loot Price: R2,783
Discovery Miles 27 830
|
|
Constitutional Rights after Globalization (Hardcover, New)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
Constitutional Rights after Globalization juxtaposes the
globalization of the economy and the worldwide spread of
constitutional charters of rights. The shift of political authority
to powerful economic actors entailed by neo-liberal globalization
challenges the traditional state-centred focus of constitutional
law. Contemporary debate has responded to this challenge in
normative terms, whether by reinterpreting rights or redirecting
their ends, e.g. to reach private actors. However, globalization
undermines the liberal legalist epistemology on which these
approaches rest, by positing the existence of multiple sites of
legal production, (e.g. multinational corporations) beyond the
state. This dynamic, between globalization and legal pluralism on
one side, and rights constitutionalism on the other, provides the
context for addressing the question of rights constitutionalism's
counterhegemonic potential. This shows first that the interpretive
and instrumental assumptions underlying constitutional adjudication
are empirically suspect: constitutional law tends more to disorder
than coherence, and frequently is an ineffective tool for social
change. Instead, legal pluralism contends that constitutionalism's
importance lies in symbolic terms as a legitimating discourse. The
competing liberal and 'new' politics of definition (the latter
highlighting how neoliberal values and institutions constrain
political action) are contrasted to show how each advances
different agenda. A comparative survey of constitutionalism's
engagement with private power shows that conceiving of
constitutions in the predominant liberal, legalist mode has broadly
favoured hegemonic interests. It is concluded that counterhegemonic
forms of constitutional discourse cannot be effected within, but
only by unthinking, the dominant liberal legalist paradigm, in a
manner that takes seriously all exercises of political power.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
You might also like..
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.