Finding the manpower to defend democracy has been a recurring
problem. Russell Weigley writes: The historic preoccupation of the
Army's thought in peacetime has been the manpower question: how, in
an unmilitary nation, to muster adequate numbers of capable
soldiers quickly should war occur. When the nature of modern
warfare made an all-volunteer army inadequate, the major Western
democracies confronted the dilemma of involuntary military service
in a free society. The core of this manuscript concerns methods by
which France, Great Britain, and the United States solved the
problem and why some solutions were more lasting and effective than
others. Flynn challenges conventional wisdom that suggests that
conscription was inefficient and that it promoted inequality of
sacrifice.
Sharing similar but not identical diplomatic outlooks, the three
countries discussed here were allies in world wars and in the Cold
War, and they also confronted the problem of using conscripts to
defend colonial interests in an age of decolonization. These
societies rest upon democratic principles, and operating a draft in
a democracy raises several unique problems. A particular tension
develops as a result of adopting forced military service in a
polity based on concepts of individual rights and freedoms. Despite
the protest and inconsistencies, the criticism and waste, Flynn
reveals that conscription served the three Western democracies well
in an historical context, proving effective in gathering fighting
men and allowing a flexibility to cope and change as problems
arose.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!