Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > International relations
|
Buy Now
The Military's Role in Counterterrorism - Examples and Implications for Liberal Democracies (Paperback)
Loot Price: R396
Discovery Miles 3 960
|
|
The Military's Role in Counterterrorism - Examples and Implications for Liberal Democracies (Paperback)
(sign in to rate)
Loot Price R396
Discovery Miles 3 960
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Donate to Against Period Poverty
Total price: R406
Discovery Miles: 4 060
|
In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 (9/11) attacks, the U.S.
Government was criticized for adopting a militaristic response to
the threat posed by al-Qaeda and affiliated groups. As the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict and that in Northern Ireland
demonstrate, any liberal democracy that uses its armed forces to
combat terrorism will incur controversy both domestically and
internationally. The use of military power in counterterrorism is
contentious, because historical and contemporary examples suggest
that it can have the following negative strategic, political, and
ethical effects: The state can generate indigenous resentment that
terrorist groups can exploit, and can, by resorting to military
force, kill or maim a substantial number of civilians. It can also
encourage human rights abuses that are antithetical to the norms of
a liberal democracy-- such as the maltreatment and torture of
detainees --and can (as demonstrated by Uruguay in 1973 and Russia
currently) lead to the subversion of the constitutional order and
its replacement by authoritarian rule. While addressing these
criticisms, this Letort Paper also argues that there are
contingencies in which democratic states are obliged to employ
military means in order to protect their citizens from the threat
of terrorism, whether in a purely domestic context or when facing a
transnational terrorist network such as al-Qaeda. While outlining
the specific roles that armed forces can perform (including hostage
rescue, military aid to the civil authority, interdiction, and
intelligence-gathering), this paper also describes the strategic,
political, diplomatic, and ethical challenges that arise from using
military means to fight terrorism either on one's home soil or in
the international arena. This paper's principal conclusion is that
democratic governments can use their armed forces if the existing
police/judicial framework cannot address the threat posed by
terrorists, but that military means have to be integrated as part
of an overarching strategy to contain terrorism and to limit the
capacity of its practitioners to conduct attacks against citizens.
The author also outlines a series of questions that civilian
decisionmakers should ideally resolve prior to turning
counterterrorism missions over to their military counterparts.
Strategic Studies Institute. LeTort Paper.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.