Books > Law > Jurisprudence & general issues > Jurisprudence & philosophy of law
|
Buy Now
Judicial Review of Legislation - A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and South Africa (Paperback, 2010)
Loot Price: R2,789
Discovery Miles 27 890
|
|
Judicial Review of Legislation - A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and South Africa (Paperback, 2010)
Series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 5
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Constitutionalism is the permanent quest to control state power, of
which the judicial review of legislation is a prime example.
Although the judicial review of legislation is increasingly common
in modern societies, it is not a finished project. This device
still raises questions as to whether judicial review is justified,
and how it may be structured. Yet, judicial review's justification
and its scope are seldom addressed in the same study, thereby
making for an inconvenient divorce of these two related avenues of
study. To narrow the divide, the object of this work is quite
straightforward. Namely, is the idea of judicial review defensible,
and what influences its design and scope? This book addresses these
matters by comparing the judicial review of legislation in the
United Kingdom (the Human Rights Act of 1998), the Netherlands (the
Halsema Proposal of 2002) and the Constitution of South Africa of
1996. These systems present valuable material to study the issues
raised by judicial review. The Netherlands is of particular
interest as its Constitution still prohibits the constitutional
review of acts of parliament, while allowing treaty review of such
acts. The Halsema Proposal wants to even out this difference by
allowing the courts also to apply constitutional norms to
legislation and not only to international norms. The Human Rights
Act and the South African Constitution also present interesting
questions that will make their study worthwhile. One can think of
the issue of dialogue between the legislature and the judiciary.
This topic enjoys increased attention in the United Kingdom but is
somewhat underexplored in South African thought on judicial review.
These and similar issues are studied in each of the three systems,
to not only gain a better understanding of the systems as such, but
also of judicial review in general.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.