Justice, equality, and righteousness--these are some of our
greatest moral convictions. Yet in times of social conflict, morals
can become rigid, making religious war, ethnic cleansing, and
political purges possible. Morality, therefore, can be viewed as
pathology-a rhetorical, psychological, and social tool that is used
and abused as a weapon.
An expert on Eastern philosophies and social systems theory,
Hans-Georg Moeller questions the perceived goodness of morality and
those who claim morality is inherently positive. Critiquing the
ethical "fanaticism" of Western moralists, such as Immanuel Kant,
Lawrence Kohlberg, John Rawls, and the utilitarians, Moeller points
to the absurd fundamentalisms and impracticable prescriptions
arising from definitions of good. Instead he advances a theory of
"moral foolishness," or moral asceticism, extracted from the
"amoral" philosophers of East Asia and such thinkers as Ludwig
Wittgenstein and Niklas Luhmann. The moral fool doesn't understand
why ethics are necessarily good, and he isn't convinced that the
moral perspective is always positive. In this way he is like most
people, and Moeller defends this foolishness against ethical
pathologies that support the death penalty, just wars, and even
Jerry Springer's crude moral theater. Comparing and contrasting the
religious philosophies of Christianity, Daoism, and Zen Buddhism,
Moeller presents a persuasive argument in favor of amorality.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!