Linguistic signs do not coincide with intended or interpreted
meanings. For relevance theory, this theoretical commonplace merely
demonstrates the inferential nature of language. For Paul de Man,
on the contrary, it suggested that language is unstable, random,
arbitrary, mechanical, ironic and inhuman. This book seeks to show
that relevance theory is a more plausible account of communication,
cognition and literary interpretation than the deconstructionist
theory de Man elaborated from readings of Rousseau, Hegel and
Nietzsche.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!