Since the mid-1950s, successive Canadian governments have
grappled
with the issue of Canada's participation in US ballistic
missile
defence programs. Until Paul Martin's Liberal government
finally
said no, policy-makers responded to US initiatives with fear
and
uncertainty as they endlessly debated the implications -- at
home
and abroad -- of participation. However, whether this is the
end
of the story remains to be seen.
Drawing on previously classified government documents and
interviews
with senior officials, James Fergusson assesses Canada's
policy
deliberations and rationales for avoiding a definitive commitment
in
response to five major US initiatives. He reveals that a
combination of
factors resulted in indecision: weak leadership, wrangling between
the
Departments of External Affairs and National Defence, a belief that
the
United States would defend Canada without much Canadian
participation,
and a tendency to place uncertain and ill-defined notions of
international security before national defence. Successive
Canadian
governments have failed to transform the debate over ballistic
missile
defence into an opportunity to define Canada's strategic
interests at home and on the world stage.
Balanced and engaging, "Canada and Ballistic Missile
Defense"
offers the first full account of Canada's uncertain response
to
US ballistic missile defence initiatives and an exploration of
the
implications of this indecision.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!