Although many observers have assumed that pluralism prevailed in
American political life from the start, inherited ideals of civic
virtue and moral unity proved stubbornly persistent and
influential. The tension between these conceptions of public life
was especially evident in the young nation's burgeoning cities.
Exploiting a wide range of sources, including novels, cartoons,
memoirs, and journalistic accounts, James J. Connolly traces
efforts to reconcile democracy and diversity in the industrializing
cities of the United States from the antebellum period through the
Progressive Era.
The necessity of redesigning civic institutions and practices to
suit city life triggered enduring disagreements centered on what
came to be called machine politics. Featuring plebian leadership, a
sharp masculinity, party discipline, and frank acknowledgment of
social differences, this new political formula first arose in
eastern cities during the mid-nineteenth century and became a
subject of national discussion after the Civil War. During the
Gilded Age and Progressive Era, business leaders, workers, and
women proposed alternative understandings of how urban democracy
might work. Some tried to create venues for deliberation that built
common ground among citizens of all classes, faiths, ethnicities,
and political persuasions. But accommodating such differences
proved difficult, and a vision of politics as the businesslike
management of a contentious modern society took precedence. As
Connolly makes clear, machine politics offered at best a
quasi-democratic way to organize urban public life. Where unity
proved elusive, machine politics provided a viable, if imperfect,
alternative.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!