Books > Reference & Interdisciplinary > Communication studies > Media studies
|
Buy Now
Peter Ramus's Attack on Cicero - Text and Translation of Ramus's brutinae Quaestiones (Paperback, Revised)
Loot Price: R1,176
Discovery Miles 11 760
|
|
Peter Ramus's Attack on Cicero - Text and Translation of Ramus's brutinae Quaestiones (Paperback, Revised)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
Cicero had written seven books on rhetoric, but Ramus chose Orator
for the attack which had been inevitable since his original
denunciation of Cicero's rhetoric in 1543. There are probably two
reasons for this. The first is that he was thus able to enter into
the widespread controversy over "Ciceronianism." More importantly,
this choice enabled him to concentrate on the one Ciceronian work
closest to his own personal view of rhetoric. For Ramus, rhetoric
was a matter only of the exterior elements of style and delivery
and Orator concentrates on style. It is set in the form of a letter
to Cicero's friend Marcus Junius Brutus responding to Brutus's
reaction to Cicero's earlier history of Roman oratory -- titled
Brutus after its dedicatee. None of Cicero's other six works on
rhetoric would have provided Ramus the same opportunity to fasten
on questions of style the way he does in the Questions of Brutus.
Ramus accuses Cicero of trying to prove that he is the "perfect
orator" about which Orator is written. He also accuses him of being
merely an unthinking follower of Aristotle. The basic assault,
however, is syllogistic. Ramus reduces Cicero's ideas to
syllogistic form to demonstrate their error and inconsistency.
Throughout, Ramus continues to claim that Cicero does not know the
true province of rhetoric. Moreover, he argues that what is found
"muddled and confused in unfathomable darkness" in this one book is
also true of all of Cicero's other books. Thus, The Questions of
Brutus becomes a wide-ranging polemic like his attack on Aristotle.
There are numerous rhetorical questions, apostrophes, exclamations,
syllogistic analyses, and a great many digressions. Basically Ramus
follows the order of Cicero's Orator, though there are occasional
backward-forward references as well. Ramus does not, however, use
the quotation-plus-interpretation method employed in the
commentaries on his orations. Instead he takes up concepts rather
than quotations, usually using specific citations only when he
wishes to attack Cicero's language on some point. Therefore, this
book is self-contained: Ramus states Cicero's position, then his
own.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.