Americans preach egalitarianism, but democracy makes it hard for
minorities to win. "Changing Minds, If Not Hearts" explores
political strategies that counteract the impulse of racial
majorities to think about racial issues as a zero-sum game, in
which a win for one group means a loss for another. James M. Glaser
and Timothy J. Ryan argue that, although political processes often
inflame racial tensions, the tools of politics also can alleviate
conflict.Through randomized experiments conducted in South
Carolina, California, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and New
Jersey, Glaser and Ryan uncover the racial underpinnings of
disputes over affirmative action, public school funding
initiatives, Confederate flag displays on government buildings,
reparations, and racial profiling. The authors examine whether
communities rife with conflict endorse different outcomes when
issues are cast in different terms--for example, by calling
attention to double standards, evoking alternate conceptions of
fairness and justice, or restructuring electoral choices to offer
voters greater control. Their studies identify a host of tools that
can help overcome opposition to minority interests that are due to
racial hostility. Even in communities averse to accommodation, even
where antipathy and prejudice linger, minorities can win.With
clearly presented data and compelling prose, "Changing Minds, If
Not Hearts" provides a vivid and practical illustration of how
academic theory can help resolve conflicts on the ground.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!