Books > Business & Economics > Economics > Econometrics
|
Buy Now
Econometric Business Cycle Research (Hardcover, 1998 ed.)
Loot Price: R3,001
Discovery Miles 30 010
|
|
Econometric Business Cycle Research (Hardcover, 1998 ed.)
Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days
|
Econometric Business Cycle Research deals with econometric business
cycle research (EBCR), a term introduced by the Nobel-laureate Jan
Tinbergen for his econometric method of testing (economic) business
cycle theories. EBCR combines economic theory and measurement in
the study of business cycles, i.e., ups and downs in overall
economic activity. We assess four methods of EBCR: business cycle
indicators, simultaneous equations models, vector autoregressive
systems and real business indicators. After a sketch of the history
of the methods, we investigate whether the methods meet the goals
of EBCR: the three traditional ones, description, forecasting and
policy evaluation, and the one Tinbergen introduced, the
implementation-testing of business cycles. The first three EBCR
methods are illustrated for the Netherlands, a typical example of a
small, open economy. The main conclusion of the book is that
simultaneous equation models are the best vehicle for EBCR, if all
its goals are to be attained simultaneously. This conclusion is
based on a fairly detailed assessment of the methods and is not
over-turned in the empirical illustrations. The main conclusion
does not imply the end of other EBCR methods. Not all goals have to
be met with a single vehicle, other methods might serve the purpose
equally well - or even better. For example, if one is interested in
business cycle forecasts, one might prefer a business cycle
indicator or vector autoregressive system. A second conclusion is
that many ideas/concepts that play an important role in current
discussions about econometric methodology in general and EBCR in
particular, were put forward in the 1930s and 1940s. A third
conclusion is that it is difficult, if not impossible, to compare
the outcomes of RBC models to outcomes of the other three methods,
because RBC modellers are not interested in modelling business
cycles on an observation-per-observation basis. A more general
conclusion in this respect is that methods should adopt the same
concept of business cycles to make them comparable.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.