Books > Social sciences > Warfare & defence > Military life & institutions
|
Buy Now
Don't - A Reader's Guide to the Military's Anti-Gay Policy (Paperback, Journal Into Book)
Loot Price: R537
Discovery Miles 5 370
You Save: R54
(9%)
|
|
Don't - A Reader's Guide to the Military's Anti-Gay Policy (Paperback, Journal Into Book)
Series: Public Planet Books
(sign in to rate)
Was R591
Loot Price R537
Discovery Miles 5 370
You Save R54 (9%)
Expected to ship within 12 - 17 working days
|
In "Don't" Janet E. Halley explains how the military's new anti-gay
policy is fundamentally misdescribed by its common nickname, "Don't
Ask/Don't Tell." This ubiquitous phrase, she points out, implies
that it discharges servicemembers not for who they are, but for
what they do. It insinuates that, as long as military personnel
keep quiet about their homosexual orientation and desist from
"homosexual conduct," no one will try to pry them out of their
closets and all will be well.
Not so, reveals Halley. In order to work through the steps by
which the new law was ultimately drafted, she opens with a close
reading of the 1986 Supreme Court sodomy case which served as the
legal and rhetorical model for the policy revisions made in 1993.
Halley also describes how the Clinton administration's attempts to
offer Congress an opportunity to regulate conduct--and not
status--were flatly rejected and not included in the final statute.
Using cultural and critical theory seldom applied to explain the
law, Halley argues that, far from providing privacy and an
assurance that servicemembers' careers will be ruined only if they
engage in illegal conduct, the rule activates a culture of minute
surveillance in which every member must strictly avoid using any
gesture in an ever-evolving lexicon of "conduct that manifests a
propensity." In other words, not only homosexuals but" all"
military personnel are placed in danger by the new policy. After
challenging previous pro-gay arguments against the policy that have
failed to expose its most devious and dangerous elements, Halley
ends with a persuasive discussion about how it is both
unconstitutional and, politically, an act of sustained bad
faith.
This knowledgeable and eye-opening analysis of one of the most
important public policy debates of the 1990s will interest legal
scholars, policymakers, activists, military historians and
personnel, as well as citizens concerned about issues of
discrimination.
General
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!
|
|
Email address subscribed successfully.
A activation email has been sent to you.
Please click the link in that email to activate your subscription.